Background: Capacity-based mental health legislation was introduced in Norway on 1 September 2017. The aim was to increase the autonomy of patients with severe mental illness and to bring mental health care in line with human rights. The aim of this study is to explore patient experiences of how far the new legislation has enabled them to be involved in decisions on their treatment after they were assessed as capable of giving consent and had their community treatment order (CTO) revoked due to the change in the legislation. Method: Individual in-depth interviews were conducted from September 2019 to March 2020 with twelve people with experience as CTO patients. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis inspired by he...
Background: Compulsory treatment in patients' homes (CTH) will be introduced in the new Dutch mental...
Context: Service user involvement in service development and research is an international goal. Howe...
Mental health legislation is often criticised for being fundamentally inconsistent with a rights-bas...
Background Norway introduced capacity-based legislation in mental healthcare on 1 September 2017 wi...
Background: Capacity-based mental health legislation was introduced in Norway on 1 September 2017. T...
Background In 2017, a capacity-based criterion was added to the Norwegian Mental Health Act, stating...
Background: Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is an evidence-based model for service delivery to e...
This study is part of the national research-based evaluation of the 12 first assertive community tre...
qualitative study of patients ’ experiences of community treatment orders within an assertive commun...
Objective: To describe the lived experiences of people subject to community treatment orders (CTOs) ...
Background Norwegian law and regulations regarding patient autonomy and the use of c...
© AHHA 2017. Objective The aim of the present study was to examine stakeholder perspectives on how t...
Objective: Paths toward referral to involuntary psychiatric admission mainly unfold in the contexts ...
© 2020 Ruth Geraldine VineBackground The use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) in the treatment a...
The use of community based compulsory treatment orders for individuals experiencing mental distress ...
Background: Compulsory treatment in patients' homes (CTH) will be introduced in the new Dutch mental...
Context: Service user involvement in service development and research is an international goal. Howe...
Mental health legislation is often criticised for being fundamentally inconsistent with a rights-bas...
Background Norway introduced capacity-based legislation in mental healthcare on 1 September 2017 wi...
Background: Capacity-based mental health legislation was introduced in Norway on 1 September 2017. T...
Background In 2017, a capacity-based criterion was added to the Norwegian Mental Health Act, stating...
Background: Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is an evidence-based model for service delivery to e...
This study is part of the national research-based evaluation of the 12 first assertive community tre...
qualitative study of patients ’ experiences of community treatment orders within an assertive commun...
Objective: To describe the lived experiences of people subject to community treatment orders (CTOs) ...
Background Norwegian law and regulations regarding patient autonomy and the use of c...
© AHHA 2017. Objective The aim of the present study was to examine stakeholder perspectives on how t...
Objective: Paths toward referral to involuntary psychiatric admission mainly unfold in the contexts ...
© 2020 Ruth Geraldine VineBackground The use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) in the treatment a...
The use of community based compulsory treatment orders for individuals experiencing mental distress ...
Background: Compulsory treatment in patients' homes (CTH) will be introduced in the new Dutch mental...
Context: Service user involvement in service development and research is an international goal. Howe...
Mental health legislation is often criticised for being fundamentally inconsistent with a rights-bas...