Objectives To evaluate the incremental value of new drugs across disease areas receiving favourable coverage decisions by the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) over the past decade. Design, setting, and participants This cross-sectional study assessed favourable appraisal decisions of drugs between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. Estimates of incremental benefit were extracted from NICE's evidence review groups reports. Primary outcome measure Incremental benefit of novel drugs relative to the best alternative therapeutic option, expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Results 184 appraisals of 129 drugs provided QALYs. The median incremental value was 0.27 QALY (IQR: 0.07-0.73). Benefits varied ac...
Objectives Before an intervention is publicly funded within the United Kingdom, the cost-effectiv...
Objectives To quantify and characterise the usage of expanded access (EA) data in National Institute...
Examines lessons from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence's use of comparative...
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incremental value of new drugs across disease areas receiving favourable...
Importance: Numerous cancer drugs have received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Admin...
Objectives: Innovative new drugs offer potential benefits to patients, healthcare systems, governmen...
<p><b>Objectives:</b> To compare the timelines and recommendations of the Scottish Medicines Consort...
New technologies, including pharmaceuticals and medical devices, can improve treatment options in he...
Objective To identify and assess the methods for estimating comparative clinical effectiveness for n...
Importance: There is a dearth of evidence examining the impact of newly licensed cancer medicines on...
Context. Positive health technology assessment (HTA) outcomes can have important implications for eq...
Objectives: Our study explores whether, and how, different methodological choices are associated wit...
Objectives: To compare the timelines and recommendations of the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) ...
Background: In 2005, a new technology appraisal process (the Single Technology Appraisal [STA]) was ...
Objectives Before an intervention is publicly funded within the United Kingdom, the cost-effectiv...
Objectives To quantify and characterise the usage of expanded access (EA) data in National Institute...
Examines lessons from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence's use of comparative...
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incremental value of new drugs across disease areas receiving favourable...
Importance: Numerous cancer drugs have received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Admin...
Objectives: Innovative new drugs offer potential benefits to patients, healthcare systems, governmen...
<p><b>Objectives:</b> To compare the timelines and recommendations of the Scottish Medicines Consort...
New technologies, including pharmaceuticals and medical devices, can improve treatment options in he...
Objective To identify and assess the methods for estimating comparative clinical effectiveness for n...
Importance: There is a dearth of evidence examining the impact of newly licensed cancer medicines on...
Context. Positive health technology assessment (HTA) outcomes can have important implications for eq...
Objectives: Our study explores whether, and how, different methodological choices are associated wit...
Objectives: To compare the timelines and recommendations of the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) ...
Background: In 2005, a new technology appraisal process (the Single Technology Appraisal [STA]) was ...
Objectives Before an intervention is publicly funded within the United Kingdom, the cost-effectiv...
Objectives To quantify and characterise the usage of expanded access (EA) data in National Institute...
Examines lessons from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence's use of comparative...