Lymph node enlargement and its clinical evaluation may be a uncomfortable task for clinicians. In most of the cases, mainly when it occurs in a clear clinical context, the diagnosis of reactive enlargement is quite straightforward as well as the corresponding therapeutic procedures. This consequential link is neither constant nor uniformly repetitive because the sites of arising, the number of involved lymph nodes, the size, the consistence and the responsiveness to the therapy may be extremely variable. Moreover, lymphadenopathy may have completely different clinical meanings depending on age, site and clinical history of patients. When the objective presentation is less clear and serological data do not explain or do not match with the cl...