Part II of this Comment will discuss real estate commissions in general. Part III will discuss different views of real estate transactions across the nation. Then, in Part IV, this Comment will suggest that a festering minority of courts in states that have a Statute of Frauds requirement are currently disregarding the statutes or simply ignoring them in favor of the law of equity. Part V suggests that because some courts are ignoring the statutes, these states should reinforce their Statute of Frauds requirement by adopting language expressly stating that the statute must be followed and no commission can be granted even in quantum meruit in the absence of a written agreement
Very few lawyers in general practice in Virginia have not been consulted at one time or another abou...
This article examines the decision in Velten v. Robertson which raises serious questions as to wheth...
This Note contends that consumers should have a private damages action under section 10. Part I disc...
Part II of this Comment will discuss real estate commissions in general. Part III will discuss diffe...
That the dictates of the law and the principles of common morality are not always blended to perfect...
While the caveat emptor (buyer beware) theory has traditionally applied to real estate purchases, co...
Shortly after its passage the validity of the statute was sustained against a constitutional attack ...
This article examines the commission claims of buyers’ brokers encounter with commissions and th...
This article discusses the California Supreme Court case Sterling v. Taylor which held that extr...
Contracts to devise real property are frequently entered into and are generally held to be a valid m...
In real estate transactions, the law will protect the innocent, unwary, and sometimes stupid, buyer ...
Hidden-But-Discoverable Defects: Resolving the Conflicts Between Real Estate Buyers and Broker
Three intermediate appellate courts in Texas have held that corporate actors— directors, officers, m...
This article discusses a California case which held that a seller’s real estate agent breached her f...
This Comment will explore the legal status and vulnerability of real estate brokers who engage in du...
Very few lawyers in general practice in Virginia have not been consulted at one time or another abou...
This article examines the decision in Velten v. Robertson which raises serious questions as to wheth...
This Note contends that consumers should have a private damages action under section 10. Part I disc...
Part II of this Comment will discuss real estate commissions in general. Part III will discuss diffe...
That the dictates of the law and the principles of common morality are not always blended to perfect...
While the caveat emptor (buyer beware) theory has traditionally applied to real estate purchases, co...
Shortly after its passage the validity of the statute was sustained against a constitutional attack ...
This article examines the commission claims of buyers’ brokers encounter with commissions and th...
This article discusses the California Supreme Court case Sterling v. Taylor which held that extr...
Contracts to devise real property are frequently entered into and are generally held to be a valid m...
In real estate transactions, the law will protect the innocent, unwary, and sometimes stupid, buyer ...
Hidden-But-Discoverable Defects: Resolving the Conflicts Between Real Estate Buyers and Broker
Three intermediate appellate courts in Texas have held that corporate actors— directors, officers, m...
This article discusses a California case which held that a seller’s real estate agent breached her f...
This Comment will explore the legal status and vulnerability of real estate brokers who engage in du...
Very few lawyers in general practice in Virginia have not been consulted at one time or another abou...
This article examines the decision in Velten v. Robertson which raises serious questions as to wheth...
This Note contends that consumers should have a private damages action under section 10. Part I disc...