Almost 30 years after acceding to the Convention against Torture, in 2017 Italy introduced the crime of torture into its penal code. There was great debate as to whether the new provisions were in line with the country’s international obligations. The first interpretations of these rules by the highest criminal court draw heavily on international notions, in particular on the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. The result is that, while the wording of the provisions remains questionable, their application tends to be consistent with (at least some) international rules
Following a decision of the Court of Cassation, Italy's refusal to extradite Mr Reverberi to Argenti...
The present article discusses the breadth of the principle upheld by the Italian Constitutional Cou...
A distinctive feature of the judicial application of international norms on criminalization in Italy...
Almost 30 years after acceding to the Convention against Torture, in 2017 Italy introduced the crim...
The UN Committee against Torture considers the introduction of a distinct offenceof torture in domes...
Much of the debate over torture in the past few years has implied, either implicitly or explicitly, ...
The introduction of a distinct offence of torture in the Italian legal order will be the most effec-...
Law No. 110 of 14 July 2017, passed with 198 votes in favour, 35 against and 104 abstentions, introd...
In April 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that Italian legislation is inadequa...
This paper analyzes the European Court of Human Rights’ ruling in the Cestaro v. Italy case, focusin...
On January 8, 2013 the European Court of Human Rights condemned Italy for the treatment of some pris...
In July 2017 the Italian Parliament adopted a new statute on torture with the aim of ensuring respec...
The proliferation of UN and EU targeted sanctions and their potential impact on individual rights an...
Amnesties, reform on paper, and emergencies suspending reform, aptly describe the vagaries of the pe...
After about 30 years from its ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Torture, Itally ...
Following a decision of the Court of Cassation, Italy's refusal to extradite Mr Reverberi to Argenti...
The present article discusses the breadth of the principle upheld by the Italian Constitutional Cou...
A distinctive feature of the judicial application of international norms on criminalization in Italy...
Almost 30 years after acceding to the Convention against Torture, in 2017 Italy introduced the crim...
The UN Committee against Torture considers the introduction of a distinct offenceof torture in domes...
Much of the debate over torture in the past few years has implied, either implicitly or explicitly, ...
The introduction of a distinct offence of torture in the Italian legal order will be the most effec-...
Law No. 110 of 14 July 2017, passed with 198 votes in favour, 35 against and 104 abstentions, introd...
In April 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that Italian legislation is inadequa...
This paper analyzes the European Court of Human Rights’ ruling in the Cestaro v. Italy case, focusin...
On January 8, 2013 the European Court of Human Rights condemned Italy for the treatment of some pris...
In July 2017 the Italian Parliament adopted a new statute on torture with the aim of ensuring respec...
The proliferation of UN and EU targeted sanctions and their potential impact on individual rights an...
Amnesties, reform on paper, and emergencies suspending reform, aptly describe the vagaries of the pe...
After about 30 years from its ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Torture, Itally ...
Following a decision of the Court of Cassation, Italy's refusal to extradite Mr Reverberi to Argenti...
The present article discusses the breadth of the principle upheld by the Italian Constitutional Cou...
A distinctive feature of the judicial application of international norms on criminalization in Italy...