This statement supplements and updates the GMO Panel guidance document on allergenicity of genetically modified (GM) plants published in 2017. In that guidance document, the GMO Panel considered that additional investigations on in vitro protein digestibility were needed before providing any additional recommendations in the form of guidance to applicants. Thus, an interim phase was proposed to assess the utility of an enhanced in vitro digestion test, as compared to the classical pepsin resistance test. Historically, resistance to degradation by pepsin using the classical pepsin resistance test has been considered as additional information, in a weight-of-evidence approach, for the assessment of allergenicity and toxicity of newly expresse...
IntroductionEvaluating the gastrointestinal fate of proteins is paramount to assess whether they are...
This Scientific Opinion addresses the formulation of specific development needs, including research ...
Rationale. Evaluation of the potential allergenicity of proteins derived from genetically modified f...
This statement supplements and updates the GMO Panel guidance document on allergenicity of genetical...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
This document provides supplementary guidance on specific topics for the allergenicity risk assessme...
The primary objective of the assessment of novel proteins is to evaluate whether they are safe to co...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
Resumen del póster presentado al 56th Congress of the European Societies of Toxicology (EUROTOX), ce...
Resumen del trabajo presentado al 4th Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Meeting, celebrado en Roma (Itali...
The weight-of-evidence, case-by-case approach is considered the most appropriate way of assessing th...
IntroductionEvaluating the gastrointestinal fate of proteins is paramount to assess whether they are...
This Scientific Opinion addresses the formulation of specific development needs, including research ...
Rationale. Evaluation of the potential allergenicity of proteins derived from genetically modified f...
This statement supplements and updates the GMO Panel guidance document on allergenicity of genetical...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
This document provides supplementary guidance on specific topics for the allergenicity risk assessme...
The primary objective of the assessment of novel proteins is to evaluate whether they are safe to co...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, ...
Resumen del póster presentado al 56th Congress of the European Societies of Toxicology (EUROTOX), ce...
Resumen del trabajo presentado al 4th Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Meeting, celebrado en Roma (Itali...
The weight-of-evidence, case-by-case approach is considered the most appropriate way of assessing th...
IntroductionEvaluating the gastrointestinal fate of proteins is paramount to assess whether they are...
This Scientific Opinion addresses the formulation of specific development needs, including research ...
Rationale. Evaluation of the potential allergenicity of proteins derived from genetically modified f...