Add to ORKGIn this paper, we generalize the lower bound on the number of rounds for Consensus algorithms assuming that processes fail dependently. This lower bound is general in the sense that it is independent of the failure assumptions for processes. In order to instantiate it, one needs to provide a necessary condition on process replication for a given failure model in terms of our abstractions to represent dependent failures. A surprising corollary of our generalization is that the lower bound on the number of rounds, in general, differs between the crash and the arbitrary failure models.Pre-2018 CSE ID: CS2003-073
This paper studies the inherent trade-off between termination probability and total step complexity ...
In consensus, the n nodes of a distributed system seek to take a consistent decision on some output,...
This paper presents a tight lower bound on the time complexity of indulgent consensus algorithms, i....
In this paper, we generalize the lower bound on the number of rounds for Consensus algorithms assumi...
We present a new abstraction to replace the $t$ of $n$ assumption used in designing fault-tolerant ...
We present an abstraction to replace the t of n assumption used in designing fault-tolerant algorit...
Introduction Most fault-tolerant algorithms are designed assuming that out of n components, no more...
We compare the consensus problem with the uniform consensus problem in synchronous systems. In contr...
Abstract — A fundamental problem of fault-tolerant distributed computing is for the reliable process...
Bivalency argument is a widely-used technique that employs forward induction to show impossibility r...
We use a straightforward bivalency argument borrowed from [FLP85] to show that in a synchronous syst...
Consensus is one of the key problems in fault-tolerant distributed computing. Although the solvabili...
International audienceWhile consensus is at the heart of many coordination problems in asynchronous ...
Bivalency argument is a widely-used technique that employs forward induction to show impossibility r...
This paper addresses the problem of determining the weakest failure detector to implement consensus ...
This paper studies the inherent trade-off between termination probability and total step complexity ...
In consensus, the n nodes of a distributed system seek to take a consistent decision on some output,...
This paper presents a tight lower bound on the time complexity of indulgent consensus algorithms, i....
In this paper, we generalize the lower bound on the number of rounds for Consensus algorithms assumi...
We present a new abstraction to replace the $t$ of $n$ assumption used in designing fault-tolerant ...
We present an abstraction to replace the t of n assumption used in designing fault-tolerant algorit...
Introduction Most fault-tolerant algorithms are designed assuming that out of n components, no more...
We compare the consensus problem with the uniform consensus problem in synchronous systems. In contr...
Abstract — A fundamental problem of fault-tolerant distributed computing is for the reliable process...
Bivalency argument is a widely-used technique that employs forward induction to show impossibility r...
We use a straightforward bivalency argument borrowed from [FLP85] to show that in a synchronous syst...
Consensus is one of the key problems in fault-tolerant distributed computing. Although the solvabili...
International audienceWhile consensus is at the heart of many coordination problems in asynchronous ...
Bivalency argument is a widely-used technique that employs forward induction to show impossibility r...
This paper addresses the problem of determining the weakest failure detector to implement consensus ...
This paper studies the inherent trade-off between termination probability and total step complexity ...
In consensus, the n nodes of a distributed system seek to take a consistent decision on some output,...
This paper presents a tight lower bound on the time complexity of indulgent consensus algorithms, i....