Conceptual art, a set of practices concerned with interrogating accepted orthodoxies of artistic authorship and the dematerialisation of the art object, is potentially incompatible with the doctrine of copyright law in both the UK and the US. Evidence of this schism is to be found in the UK, where only a specific list of narrowly defined types of artistic expression are protected, and in both jurisdictions through the application of the criteria for subsistence generally. The hypothesis of this study is that copyright protection for conceptual art practices is intermittent and that the alternative legal and non-legal forms of protection employed within the art world are currently more effective because they embrace a less restrictive concep...