Moral judgements are claimed to be evaluative processes by cognityvists as well as by noncognityvists. The latter consider attitudes to be evaluative in nature and equivalent to evaluation itself. They also agree that moral judgement about an object or a phenomenon can be made only if one has an attitude towards them. Philosophers as well as psychologists agree that moral attitudes manifest themselves by moral evaluative judgements
Over the last few years, there has been a surge of work in a new field called “moral psychology”, wh...
In contemporary moral psychology, an often-heard claim is that knowing how we make moral judgments c...
Rational choice models are characterized by the image of the self-interested Homo economicus. The ro...
Moral judgements are claimed to be evaluative processes by cognityvists as well as by noncognityvist...
What is it to make a moral judgement? There are two standard views, cognitivist and non-cognitivist...
The aim of the paper is to analyse the concept of moral perception. Moral perception gets characteri...
Moral non-cognitivists hope to explain the nature of moral agreement and disagreement as agreement a...
The paper explicates a set of criteria the joint satisfaction of which is taken to qualify moral jud...
The Emotional Perception Model of moral judgment intends to account for experientialism about morali...
Non-cognitivists are known to face a problem in extending their account of straightforward predicati...
The role of emotion in moral judgment is a relatively young topic of investigation in cognitive scie...
The present study examines the relation between the moral intuitions proposed by the ‘Moral Foundati...
Moral judgment can be defined as the evaluation of actions with respect to social norms and values e...
I defend a cognitivist view of moral language and of moral judgments. Moral language is best interpr...
Cognitive and emotional processes both seem to contribute in the production of moral judgments, but ...
Over the last few years, there has been a surge of work in a new field called “moral psychology”, wh...
In contemporary moral psychology, an often-heard claim is that knowing how we make moral judgments c...
Rational choice models are characterized by the image of the self-interested Homo economicus. The ro...
Moral judgements are claimed to be evaluative processes by cognityvists as well as by noncognityvist...
What is it to make a moral judgement? There are two standard views, cognitivist and non-cognitivist...
The aim of the paper is to analyse the concept of moral perception. Moral perception gets characteri...
Moral non-cognitivists hope to explain the nature of moral agreement and disagreement as agreement a...
The paper explicates a set of criteria the joint satisfaction of which is taken to qualify moral jud...
The Emotional Perception Model of moral judgment intends to account for experientialism about morali...
Non-cognitivists are known to face a problem in extending their account of straightforward predicati...
The role of emotion in moral judgment is a relatively young topic of investigation in cognitive scie...
The present study examines the relation between the moral intuitions proposed by the ‘Moral Foundati...
Moral judgment can be defined as the evaluation of actions with respect to social norms and values e...
I defend a cognitivist view of moral language and of moral judgments. Moral language is best interpr...
Cognitive and emotional processes both seem to contribute in the production of moral judgments, but ...
Over the last few years, there has been a surge of work in a new field called “moral psychology”, wh...
In contemporary moral psychology, an often-heard claim is that knowing how we make moral judgments c...
Rational choice models are characterized by the image of the self-interested Homo economicus. The ro...
DOI
Add to ORKG