Add to ORKGOn May 15, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (The Federal Circuit) handed down its decision in Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. The court held that Samsung’s mobile phones had infringed two of Apple’s design patents for the iPhone series of products, D593,087, which claims some ornamental design regarding the iPhone bezel, and D604,305, which claims the ornamental design of the GUI (graphical user interface). The Federal Circuit invoked 35 U.S.C. § 289, which states: “Whoever during the term of a patent for a design, without license of the owner, (1) applies the patented design, or any colorable imitation thereof, to any article of manufacture for the purpose of sale, or (2) sells or exposes for sale any arti...
More than ten years after the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in eBay v. MercExchang...
In a span of three weeks during the spring of 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued three patent decis...
With Samsung win on Galaxy Tab, judge may reconsider U.S. ban article by Basil Katz and Dan Levine ...
On May 15, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (The Federal Circuit) ha...
This case presents two issues that justify this Court’s review. First, the Federal Circuit upheld a ...
Smartphones have become a universal item. A smartphone is comprised of hundreds of thousands of pate...
The Supreme Court in Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple, Inc. wrestled with the question of determinin...
The United States Supreme Court decided six very important patent cases in the 2016-17 term, Samsung...
Nidhi Garg writes an article about how design patent protection affects product lines and the averag...
The jury verdict in the Apple v. Samsung case is in, and it is a whopper: $1.05 billion in damages, ...
The Supreme Court's perfunctory opinion in Samsung Electronics Company v. Apple, has left to the low...
This Note addresses the diverging approaches to patent infringement damage calculations. Judge Alsu...
High-technology companies that have brought innovation to the market also use their innovation to cl...
More than ten years after the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in eBay v. MercExchang...
Design patents are a useful tool and have been used successfully in a number of industries with long...
More than ten years after the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in eBay v. MercExchang...
In a span of three weeks during the spring of 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued three patent decis...
With Samsung win on Galaxy Tab, judge may reconsider U.S. ban article by Basil Katz and Dan Levine ...
On May 15, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (The Federal Circuit) ha...
This case presents two issues that justify this Court’s review. First, the Federal Circuit upheld a ...
Smartphones have become a universal item. A smartphone is comprised of hundreds of thousands of pate...
The Supreme Court in Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple, Inc. wrestled with the question of determinin...
The United States Supreme Court decided six very important patent cases in the 2016-17 term, Samsung...
Nidhi Garg writes an article about how design patent protection affects product lines and the averag...
The jury verdict in the Apple v. Samsung case is in, and it is a whopper: $1.05 billion in damages, ...
The Supreme Court's perfunctory opinion in Samsung Electronics Company v. Apple, has left to the low...
This Note addresses the diverging approaches to patent infringement damage calculations. Judge Alsu...
High-technology companies that have brought innovation to the market also use their innovation to cl...
More than ten years after the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in eBay v. MercExchang...
Design patents are a useful tool and have been used successfully in a number of industries with long...
More than ten years after the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in eBay v. MercExchang...
In a span of three weeks during the spring of 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued three patent decis...
With Samsung win on Galaxy Tab, judge may reconsider U.S. ban article by Basil Katz and Dan Levine ...