Emergence of overwintered larvae of eye-spotted bud moth, Spilonota ocellana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in relation to temperature and apple tree phenology at Summerland, British Columbia

We recorded daily appearance of overwintered larvae of eye-spotted bud moth (ESBM), Spilonota ocellana (Denis & Schiffermüller) in spring 1992, 1994, and 1996 in an unsprayed apple orchard at Summerland, British Columbia, to relate larval emergence to degree-day (DD) accumulation and apple phenology. In all years the first larva was found between mid-March and early April, and none appeared after late April. Median emergence of larvae occurred when McIntosh apple trees were at early, tight-cluster stage of fruit-bud development. Larval head capsule measurements showed that ESBM usually overwinter as fifth and sixth instars, with a small proportion (≤6%) as fourth instar larvae. In the laboratory we monitored emergence of non-diapausing overwintered larvae from apple branches incubated at 8.8, 9.4, 12.9, 15.0, 18.0, and 20.9ºC. A least-squares linear regression described emergence over this temperature range relatively accurately (r2 = 0.57, P < 0.05) and a base temperature for emergence (Tb = 1.0ºC ± 0.6) was extrapolated from this regression. Regression analysis indicated median emergence should require 154.6 ± 6.7 DD above 1ºC (DD 1ºC). Using daily airtemperature maxima and minima and 1 March to start accumulating DD1ºC, the error between predicted and observed days to median emergence in the field was -6.7 ± 3.1 d; the regression model predicted early in every case. Using observed larval appearance on apples (1992, 1994, & 1996) and an iterative process, we determined that a combination of 6ºC as the Tb and 1 January as a date to start accumulating DD6ºC, minimized the coefficient of variation for the three-year mean DD 6ºC accumulations (82.7 ± 3.5 DD 6ºC) required for 50% of the larvae to appear in the field. While this latter DD index described observed emergence of larvae accurately, and its use may help improve management of ESBM, it should be validated using independent data before growers use it routinely