Texas courts have solidified the rule that retirement benefits are community property, subject to judicial division on divorce. The courts have largely overlooked an area of federal law and regulation involving the distinction between retirement from active duty and absolute retirement from service. Generally, regularly commissioned officers remain in the military even after retiring from active duty, while officers with reserve commissions terminate their military commitment upon retirement. Texas courts have not observed the distinction between the retirement benefits for regular and reserve officers, which are correctly labeled retired pay and retirement pay, respectively. Hence, current wages fall outside of the classifications of separ...
Your Court Review Editors asked Mark Sullivan, nationally known expert on the military divorce, to c...
In the interest of uniformity, benefits for the loss of earning capacity should be subject to the sa...
A retired naval officer was charged with violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice based up...
Texas courts have solidified the rule that retirement benefits are community property, subject to ju...
Petitioner-wife and respondent-husband were married a year after he entered the military service, an...
The Uniformed Services Former Spouses\u27 Protection Act authorizes a division of military retiremen...
This report provides a general discussion of legislative provisions and proposals relating to the mi...
When the marriage mission fails and divorce is on the horizon, it is imperative that both parties, e...
In 1981, the Supreme Court rendered a decision prohibiting state courts from dividing, as marital pr...
Peace officers in Texas’ Teachers Retirement System (TRS) are not afforded early retirement age and ...
The laws of individual states have historically controlled familial relationships and the rights and...
The 2016 amendment to the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act dramatically changed the...
This Article examines whether the law forbidding division of certain federal pension benefits betwee...
In the interest of uniformity, benefits for the loss of earning capacity should be subject to the sa...
Your Court Review Editors asked Mark Sullivan, nationally known expert on the military divorce, to c...
In the interest of uniformity, benefits for the loss of earning capacity should be subject to the sa...
A retired naval officer was charged with violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice based up...
Texas courts have solidified the rule that retirement benefits are community property, subject to ju...
Petitioner-wife and respondent-husband were married a year after he entered the military service, an...
The Uniformed Services Former Spouses\u27 Protection Act authorizes a division of military retiremen...
This report provides a general discussion of legislative provisions and proposals relating to the mi...
When the marriage mission fails and divorce is on the horizon, it is imperative that both parties, e...
In 1981, the Supreme Court rendered a decision prohibiting state courts from dividing, as marital pr...
Peace officers in Texas’ Teachers Retirement System (TRS) are not afforded early retirement age and ...
The laws of individual states have historically controlled familial relationships and the rights and...
The 2016 amendment to the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act dramatically changed the...
This Article examines whether the law forbidding division of certain federal pension benefits betwee...
In the interest of uniformity, benefits for the loss of earning capacity should be subject to the sa...
Your Court Review Editors asked Mark Sullivan, nationally known expert on the military divorce, to c...
In the interest of uniformity, benefits for the loss of earning capacity should be subject to the sa...
A retired naval officer was charged with violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice based up...