Through a detailed analysis of exterior and interior images of the female body, this book questions how the visual representation of women has been used to remove women's bodies from varying discourses, especially in relation to the matter of generation and reproduction. Roberta McGrath examines the relationship between human reproduction and cultural representation from 1750-1910, taking examples from medical archives, covering engraving, photography, radiography and microscopy. The book is interdisciplinary in approach, ranging across feminist theory, history of medicine and philosophy of science, as well as the history of photography. It argues that these historical images - shocking, erroneous, provocative - are absolutely crucial in un...
Increased access to visual archives and the proliferation of digitized images related to sexuality h...
Eschewing the symbolic in favour of commitment to the unmediated replication of exactly that which i...
I’d like to be able to say that Diana Scully and Pauline Bart’s critique of gynaecological textbooks...
Through a detailed analysis of exterior and interior images of the female body, this book questions ...
A sociological and historical study of the development of reproductive technologies, this book focus...
"In this paper I argue that narrating the embryological origin story through traditional scientific ...
This paper examines the role of the images pregnant female body within the historical developments o...
Sex hormones today are seen as central to the production of biological sexual difference. This artic...
Investigating the theoretical and practical ways in which focusing on female biology can not only al...
Feminist philosophers of technoscience have long argued that it is vital that we question biomedical...
In this thesis, I propose a revision of various positions taken by feminist study which aid us in co...
This volume addresses a set of historical questions that explore the multiple aspects associated wit...
This essay presents the early days of human cytogenetics, from the late 1950s until the mid 1970s, ...
Anatomy texts are seen as authoritative sources for knowledge about natural sex differences. The con...
This article reviews recent work in the social study of science (Social Studies of Knowledge or SSK)...
Increased access to visual archives and the proliferation of digitized images related to sexuality h...
Eschewing the symbolic in favour of commitment to the unmediated replication of exactly that which i...
I’d like to be able to say that Diana Scully and Pauline Bart’s critique of gynaecological textbooks...
Through a detailed analysis of exterior and interior images of the female body, this book questions ...
A sociological and historical study of the development of reproductive technologies, this book focus...
"In this paper I argue that narrating the embryological origin story through traditional scientific ...
This paper examines the role of the images pregnant female body within the historical developments o...
Sex hormones today are seen as central to the production of biological sexual difference. This artic...
Investigating the theoretical and practical ways in which focusing on female biology can not only al...
Feminist philosophers of technoscience have long argued that it is vital that we question biomedical...
In this thesis, I propose a revision of various positions taken by feminist study which aid us in co...
This volume addresses a set of historical questions that explore the multiple aspects associated wit...
This essay presents the early days of human cytogenetics, from the late 1950s until the mid 1970s, ...
Anatomy texts are seen as authoritative sources for knowledge about natural sex differences. The con...
This article reviews recent work in the social study of science (Social Studies of Knowledge or SSK)...
Increased access to visual archives and the proliferation of digitized images related to sexuality h...
Eschewing the symbolic in favour of commitment to the unmediated replication of exactly that which i...
I’d like to be able to say that Diana Scully and Pauline Bart’s critique of gynaecological textbooks...