The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, even though they were amended in 2006 specifically to address the costs and scale of ediscovery, not only fail to contain the cost or scope of discovery, but, in fact, encourage expensive litigation ancillary to the merits of civil litigants\u27 cases. This Article proposes that the solution to this dilemma is to eliminate the presumption that the producing party should pay for the cost of discovery. This rule should be abandoned in favor of a rule that would equally distribute the costs of discovery between the requesting and producing parties
Third-year student Aaron Walter\u27s award-winning article on electronic discovery and new amendment...
This short essay explores the increasing importance of e-discovery to litigants in both federal and ...
This article analyzes the costly effect of electronic information on discovery practice and advocate...
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, even though they were amended in 2006 specifically to address ...
[Excerpt] “The increase in e-discovery, e-discovery‘s impact on litigation, and the courts‘ unavoida...
Against this backdrop of the spiraling cost and burden of the discovery process, an issue is percola...
This Article highlights a growing problem for litigants who are involved in electronic data discover...
In 1938, the passage of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) established discovery practice. ...
Discovery costs have ballooned over the last decade, in large part because attorneys must review vas...
This Article addresses the myriad problems posed by unfettered discovery in the United States Rather...
The impact of the technological revolution on the operation of the discovery system in the federal c...
The ever-increasing importance of digital technology in today’s commercial environment has created s...
Now that computers and the Internet have radically changed the way businesses create and transmit in...
The 2006 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which were enacted to address the poten...
There are currently various sources of authority that federal courts can invoke to sanction attorney...
Third-year student Aaron Walter\u27s award-winning article on electronic discovery and new amendment...
This short essay explores the increasing importance of e-discovery to litigants in both federal and ...
This article analyzes the costly effect of electronic information on discovery practice and advocate...
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, even though they were amended in 2006 specifically to address ...
[Excerpt] “The increase in e-discovery, e-discovery‘s impact on litigation, and the courts‘ unavoida...
Against this backdrop of the spiraling cost and burden of the discovery process, an issue is percola...
This Article highlights a growing problem for litigants who are involved in electronic data discover...
In 1938, the passage of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) established discovery practice. ...
Discovery costs have ballooned over the last decade, in large part because attorneys must review vas...
This Article addresses the myriad problems posed by unfettered discovery in the United States Rather...
The impact of the technological revolution on the operation of the discovery system in the federal c...
The ever-increasing importance of digital technology in today’s commercial environment has created s...
Now that computers and the Internet have radically changed the way businesses create and transmit in...
The 2006 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which were enacted to address the poten...
There are currently various sources of authority that federal courts can invoke to sanction attorney...
Third-year student Aaron Walter\u27s award-winning article on electronic discovery and new amendment...
This short essay explores the increasing importance of e-discovery to litigants in both federal and ...
This article analyzes the costly effect of electronic information on discovery practice and advocate...