Plaintiff, an American citizen, was employed by defendant contractor to work on construction in Iraq carried on under a contract with the United States. Plaintiff brought suit in New York for overtime pay under the Federal Eight Hour Law applying to work done under Every contract made to which the United States ... is a party .... A verdict for the plaintiff was upheld by the New York Court of Appeals. On certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, held, reversed. In absence of contrary intent, legislation is presumed to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the country. Foley Bros., Inc., v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281, 69 S.Ct. 575 (1949)
The judge-made presumption against extraterritoriality has recently become a motley patchwork of ecc...
In Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger the Supreme Court last Term addressed for the first time ...
Respondent employers refused to enter a union shop agreement with the petitioning unions, who then b...
Decedent, an airlines employee, was killed in a plane crash at Harmon Field, Newfoundland, a base le...
Plaintiff, a citizen of Texas, obtained from the defendant an insurance policy which was written and...
Defendant, a resident of Utah, sued petitioner, a resident of California, to recover construction co...
Conflict of Laws--Torts--Lex Loci Delicti Is Proper Law When Parties Are Domiciled in Different Juri...
Petitioner, a resident and citizen of Mississippi, brought a negligence action based upon diversity ...
This note argues that the Eighth Circuit\u27s decision to claim jurisdiction in Industrial Wire Prod...
Respondent railroads sued in the Court of Claims to recover from petitioner United States, as shippe...
As a device for recovering excessive profits, federal legislation authorized the Secretary of War to...
Plaintiff brought an action in New York for specific performance of an oral agreement allegedly made...
The presumption against extraterritoriality tells courts to read a territorial limit into statutes t...
The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclus...
The defendant, a resident of Wisconsin, was engaged in the business of selling appliances and sent o...
The judge-made presumption against extraterritoriality has recently become a motley patchwork of ecc...
In Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger the Supreme Court last Term addressed for the first time ...
Respondent employers refused to enter a union shop agreement with the petitioning unions, who then b...
Decedent, an airlines employee, was killed in a plane crash at Harmon Field, Newfoundland, a base le...
Plaintiff, a citizen of Texas, obtained from the defendant an insurance policy which was written and...
Defendant, a resident of Utah, sued petitioner, a resident of California, to recover construction co...
Conflict of Laws--Torts--Lex Loci Delicti Is Proper Law When Parties Are Domiciled in Different Juri...
Petitioner, a resident and citizen of Mississippi, brought a negligence action based upon diversity ...
This note argues that the Eighth Circuit\u27s decision to claim jurisdiction in Industrial Wire Prod...
Respondent railroads sued in the Court of Claims to recover from petitioner United States, as shippe...
As a device for recovering excessive profits, federal legislation authorized the Secretary of War to...
Plaintiff brought an action in New York for specific performance of an oral agreement allegedly made...
The presumption against extraterritoriality tells courts to read a territorial limit into statutes t...
The Article proceeds from the premise, established in Part I, that federal courts must apply preclus...
The defendant, a resident of Wisconsin, was engaged in the business of selling appliances and sent o...
The judge-made presumption against extraterritoriality has recently become a motley patchwork of ecc...
In Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger the Supreme Court last Term addressed for the first time ...
Respondent employers refused to enter a union shop agreement with the petitioning unions, who then b...