Odds ratios and risk ratios are useful measures of effect size in 2-group studies in which the response variable is dichotomous. Confidence interval methods are proposed for combining and comparing odds ratios and risk ratios in multistudy designs. Unlike the traditional fixed-effect meta-analysis methods, the proposed varying coefficient methods do not require effect-size homogeneity, and unlike the randomeffects meta-analysis methods, the proposed varying coefficient methods do not assume that the effect sizes from the selected studies represent a random sample from a normally distributed superpopulation of effect sizes. The results of extensive simulation studies suggest that the proposed varying coefficient methods have excellent perfor...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta‐analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta‐analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta‐analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The difference between two proportions, referred to as a risk difference, is a useful measure of eff...
Two interval estimation methods for a general linear function of binomial proportions have been prop...
Two interval estimation methods for a general linear function of binomial proportions have been prop...
Two methods of quantifying heterogeneity between studies in meta-analysis were studied. One method q...
In studies where the response variable is measured on a ratio scale, a ratio of means or medians pro...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
Random-effects meta-analysis requires an estimate of the between-study variance, $\tau^2$. We study ...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
One of the main objectives in meta-analysis is to estimate the overall effect size by calculating a ...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta‐analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta‐analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta‐analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The difference between two proportions, referred to as a risk difference, is a useful measure of eff...
Two interval estimation methods for a general linear function of binomial proportions have been prop...
Two interval estimation methods for a general linear function of binomial proportions have been prop...
Two methods of quantifying heterogeneity between studies in meta-analysis were studied. One method q...
In studies where the response variable is measured on a ratio scale, a ratio of means or medians pro...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
Random-effects meta-analysis requires an estimate of the between-study variance, $\tau^2$. We study ...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
One of the main objectives in meta-analysis is to estimate the overall effect size by calculating a ...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta‐analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta‐analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta‐analysis do often not share a common true effect size...