Two methods of quantifying heterogeneity between studies in meta-analysis were studied. One method quanti-fied the proportion of the total variance of the effect estimate due to variation between studies (RI), and the other calibrated the variance between studies to the size of the effect itself through a between-study coefficient of varia-tion (CVB). Bootstrap and asymptotic confidence intervals for RI and CVB were derived and evaluated in an exten-sive simulation study that covered a wide range of scenarios likely to be encountered in practice. The best performance was given by asymptotic Wald confidence intervals developed for RI and CVB. The use of these het-erogeneity measures together with their confidence intervals was illustrated in...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
Abstract Background Confidence intervals for the betw...
Meta-analyses are conducted to synthesize the quantitative results of related studies. The random-ef...
Abstract Background Confidence intervals for the between study variance are useful in random-effects...
The identification of heterogeneity in effects between studies is a key issue in meta-analyses of ob...
The difference between two proportions, referred to as a risk difference, is a useful measure of eff...
To conduct a meta-analysis, one needs to express the results from a set of related studies in terms ...
Odds ratios and risk ratios are useful measures of effect size in 2-group studies in which the respo...
One of the main objectives in meta-analysis is to estimate the overall effect size by calculating a ...
Evaluation of important causes of heterogeneity among study results is an important component of any...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
Background: Meta-regression is becoming increasingly used to model study level covariate effects. Ho...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
Abstract Background Confidence intervals for the betw...
Meta-analyses are conducted to synthesize the quantitative results of related studies. The random-ef...
Abstract Background Confidence intervals for the between study variance are useful in random-effects...
The identification of heterogeneity in effects between studies is a key issue in meta-analyses of ob...
The difference between two proportions, referred to as a risk difference, is a useful measure of eff...
To conduct a meta-analysis, one needs to express the results from a set of related studies in terms ...
Odds ratios and risk ratios are useful measures of effect size in 2-group studies in which the respo...
One of the main objectives in meta-analysis is to estimate the overall effect size by calculating a ...
Evaluation of important causes of heterogeneity among study results is an important component of any...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
Background: Meta-regression is becoming increasingly used to model study level covariate effects. Ho...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...
The effect sizes of studies included in a meta-analysis do often not share a common true effect size...