Add to ORKGWilliam Lane Craig’s much-discussed kalam cosmological argument for God’s existence is intended to provide support for a particular theistic explanation of the origin of the universe. I argue here that Craig’s theistic account of the origin of the universe entails two contradictions and hence should be rejected. The main contribution of the paper is the identification of some relatively straightforward but previously unrecognized problems in Craig’s hypothesis that the beginning of the universe was a temporal effect of a timeless personal cause
Kalam cosmological arguments have recently been the subject of criticisms, at least inter alia, by p...
Erik Wielenberg seeks to advance his critique of the kalām cosmological argument by putting forward ...
Cosmological arguments attempt to prove the existence of God by appeal to the necessity of a first c...
William Lane Craig’s much-discussed kalam cosmological argument for God’s existence is intended to p...
In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig’s theistic account of the origin of t...
In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig’s theistic account of the origin of t...
Among different arguments for the existence of God the Kalam cosmological argument is a very famous ...
The concept of dependent origination is essential in understanding Buddhist thought, for it is centr...
According to the orthodox interpretation of bounce cosmologies, the universe was born from an entrop...
William Lane Craig has revived interest in the medieval kalām argument to the point where it is now ...
William Lane Craig’s defence of the kalam cosmological argument rests heavily on two philosophical a...
Erik J. Wielenberg argues that William Lane Craig’s understanding of creatio ex nihilo (creation out...
In ‘Professor Mackie and the Kalam Cosmological Argument’ , 367–75), Professor William Lane Craig un...
Kalam cosmological arguments have recently been the subject of criticisms, at least inter alia, by p...
Erik Wielenberg seeks to advance his critique of the kalām cosmological argument by putting forward ...
Cosmological arguments attempt to prove the existence of God by appeal to the necessity of a first c...
William Lane Craig’s much-discussed kalam cosmological argument for God’s existence is intended to p...
In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig’s theistic account of the origin of t...
In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig’s theistic account of the origin of t...
Among different arguments for the existence of God the Kalam cosmological argument is a very famous ...
The concept of dependent origination is essential in understanding Buddhist thought, for it is centr...
According to the orthodox interpretation of bounce cosmologies, the universe was born from an entrop...
William Lane Craig has revived interest in the medieval kalām argument to the point where it is now ...
William Lane Craig’s defence of the kalam cosmological argument rests heavily on two philosophical a...
Erik J. Wielenberg argues that William Lane Craig’s understanding of creatio ex nihilo (creation out...
In ‘Professor Mackie and the Kalam Cosmological Argument’ , 367–75), Professor William Lane Craig un...
Kalam cosmological arguments have recently been the subject of criticisms, at least inter alia, by p...
Erik Wielenberg seeks to advance his critique of the kalām cosmological argument by putting forward ...
Cosmological arguments attempt to prove the existence of God by appeal to the necessity of a first c...