In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig’s theistic account of the origin of the universe implies that at the first moment of time, t1, God is both timeless and temporal, a contradiction (Wielenberg 2021). Craig responded to that argument; I here reply to Craig’s response
This paper looks at several key motivations behind the prisoner of time objection and a view against...
This paper considers two problems -- one in philosophy of religion and another in philosophy of phys...
William Lane Craig is the most recognizable contemporary defender of the kalam cosmological argument...
In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig’s theistic account of the origin of t...
William Lane Craig’s much-discussed kalam cosmological argument for God’s existence is intended to p...
William Lane Craig’s much-discussed kalam cosmological argument for God’s existence is intended to p...
Erik J. Wielenberg argues that William Lane Craig’s understanding of creatio ex nihilo (creation out...
Erik Wielenberg seeks to advance his critique of the kalām cosmological argument by putting forward ...
Eric Wielenberg’s two alleged contradictions in my view of God, time, and creation are easily resolv...
God’s temporality is still debated today by theologians and philosophers with whether God is tempora...
For much of the history of the philosophy of religion it was generally accepted that God existed out...
According to the orthodox interpretation of bounce cosmologies, the universe was born from an entrop...
William Lane Craig has revived interest in the medieval kalām argument to the point where it is now ...
Stephen Puryear argues that William Lane Craig's view, that time as duration is logically prior to t...
William Lane Craig’s defence of the kalam cosmological argument rests heavily on two philosophical a...
This paper looks at several key motivations behind the prisoner of time objection and a view against...
This paper considers two problems -- one in philosophy of religion and another in philosophy of phys...
William Lane Craig is the most recognizable contemporary defender of the kalam cosmological argument...
In a recent paper in this journal, I argued that William Craig’s theistic account of the origin of t...
William Lane Craig’s much-discussed kalam cosmological argument for God’s existence is intended to p...
William Lane Craig’s much-discussed kalam cosmological argument for God’s existence is intended to p...
Erik J. Wielenberg argues that William Lane Craig’s understanding of creatio ex nihilo (creation out...
Erik Wielenberg seeks to advance his critique of the kalām cosmological argument by putting forward ...
Eric Wielenberg’s two alleged contradictions in my view of God, time, and creation are easily resolv...
God’s temporality is still debated today by theologians and philosophers with whether God is tempora...
For much of the history of the philosophy of religion it was generally accepted that God existed out...
According to the orthodox interpretation of bounce cosmologies, the universe was born from an entrop...
William Lane Craig has revived interest in the medieval kalām argument to the point where it is now ...
Stephen Puryear argues that William Lane Craig's view, that time as duration is logically prior to t...
William Lane Craig’s defence of the kalam cosmological argument rests heavily on two philosophical a...
This paper looks at several key motivations behind the prisoner of time objection and a view against...
This paper considers two problems -- one in philosophy of religion and another in philosophy of phys...
William Lane Craig is the most recognizable contemporary defender of the kalam cosmological argument...