Add to ORKGBurgeoning advanced technology-assisted review (TAR) methods challenge justifications for requesting parties’ burdens and litigant cooperation in e-discovery. Increasingly accurate and accessible TAR introduces novel issues in e-discovery, including determining the proportionality of discovery requests and managing information in spoliation cases. This Essay recommends reconsidering the judiciary’s role in e-discovery in light of new technology and argues that courts, particularly lower courts, need expert technical guidance to adequately address the issues e-discovery presents
Selected via a blind review process.With the series of decisions in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg1-4 and t...
This article analyzes the costly effect of electronic information on discovery practice and advocate...
Cooperation, proportionality, and spoliation were the hot topics in electronic discovery in the Unit...
Burgeoning advanced technology-assisted review (TAR) methods challenge justifications for requesting...
Even for those who are aware of the existence of advanced search and review tactics beyond keyword s...
E-discovery processes that use automated tools to prioritize and select documents for review are typ...
Discovery costs have ballooned over the last decade, in large part because attorneys must review vas...
[Excerpt] “The increase in e-discovery, e-discovery‘s impact on litigation, and the courts‘ unavoida...
Against this backdrop of the spiraling cost and burden of the discovery process, an issue is percola...
Now that computers and the Internet have radically changed the way businesses create and transmit in...
In the twenty-first century, persons involved in the legal profession will be forced to confront tec...
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, even though they were amended in 2006 specifically to address ...
The volume of electronically stored information (ESI) is expanding rapidly. Under the Federal Rules ...
This short essay explores the increasing importance of e-discovery to litigants in both federal and ...
In 1938, the passage of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) established discovery practice. ...
Selected via a blind review process.With the series of decisions in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg1-4 and t...
This article analyzes the costly effect of electronic information on discovery practice and advocate...
Cooperation, proportionality, and spoliation were the hot topics in electronic discovery in the Unit...
Burgeoning advanced technology-assisted review (TAR) methods challenge justifications for requesting...
Even for those who are aware of the existence of advanced search and review tactics beyond keyword s...
E-discovery processes that use automated tools to prioritize and select documents for review are typ...
Discovery costs have ballooned over the last decade, in large part because attorneys must review vas...
[Excerpt] “The increase in e-discovery, e-discovery‘s impact on litigation, and the courts‘ unavoida...
Against this backdrop of the spiraling cost and burden of the discovery process, an issue is percola...
Now that computers and the Internet have radically changed the way businesses create and transmit in...
In the twenty-first century, persons involved in the legal profession will be forced to confront tec...
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, even though they were amended in 2006 specifically to address ...
The volume of electronically stored information (ESI) is expanding rapidly. Under the Federal Rules ...
This short essay explores the increasing importance of e-discovery to litigants in both federal and ...
In 1938, the passage of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) established discovery practice. ...
Selected via a blind review process.With the series of decisions in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg1-4 and t...
This article analyzes the costly effect of electronic information on discovery practice and advocate...
Cooperation, proportionality, and spoliation were the hot topics in electronic discovery in the Unit...