Job evaluation instruments have recently been the subject of a number of critical reviews. In these reviews, job evaluation methods have been criticized for sex bias in the selection and weighting of factors. The present work investigated whether males and females differed in their ratings of importance on ten job evaluation factors and whether different weighting techniques would result in different wage structures. The results indicated that rater gender explained little of the variation in the ratings of the job evaluation factors. © 1987, Sage Publications. All rights reserved
Gender bias in the evaluation of job candidates has been demonstrated in business, government, and a...
A study was designed to replicate and expand on Goldberg's 1968 study\ud on evaluation bias. Evaluat...
This study was designed to examine the influence of several potential sources of bias in the rating ...
Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality ...
This research examined the effects of sex differences in rater and ratee on hiring decisions for ma...
Gender differences in salaries are prominent in most fields. Several laws exist to decrease the amou...
Gender-neutral job evaluation has become a key method for confirming the presence of value discrimin...
Comparable worth advocates have suggested that job evaluation procedures can be utilized to establis...
Effects of selection risk on sex discrimination in hiring were investigated. Ninety-six male and fem...
The intention behind imposing quotas for women on corporate boards is to close the gender gap in eco...
In this paper we argue that invalid weighting instructions are recommended in three international ge...
Recent work has questioned whether a single job evaluation instrument can reliably measure jobs from...
Status Characteristics theory predicts that gender will become salient and activate different perfor...
Research investigating sex differences in occupational aspirations and expectations often uses an oc...
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of attractiveness and sex on subsequent evalua...
Gender bias in the evaluation of job candidates has been demonstrated in business, government, and a...
A study was designed to replicate and expand on Goldberg's 1968 study\ud on evaluation bias. Evaluat...
This study was designed to examine the influence of several potential sources of bias in the rating ...
Due to the character of the original source materials and the nature of batch digitization, quality ...
This research examined the effects of sex differences in rater and ratee on hiring decisions for ma...
Gender differences in salaries are prominent in most fields. Several laws exist to decrease the amou...
Gender-neutral job evaluation has become a key method for confirming the presence of value discrimin...
Comparable worth advocates have suggested that job evaluation procedures can be utilized to establis...
Effects of selection risk on sex discrimination in hiring were investigated. Ninety-six male and fem...
The intention behind imposing quotas for women on corporate boards is to close the gender gap in eco...
In this paper we argue that invalid weighting instructions are recommended in three international ge...
Recent work has questioned whether a single job evaluation instrument can reliably measure jobs from...
Status Characteristics theory predicts that gender will become salient and activate different perfor...
Research investigating sex differences in occupational aspirations and expectations often uses an oc...
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of attractiveness and sex on subsequent evalua...
Gender bias in the evaluation of job candidates has been demonstrated in business, government, and a...
A study was designed to replicate and expand on Goldberg's 1968 study\ud on evaluation bias. Evaluat...
This study was designed to examine the influence of several potential sources of bias in the rating ...