This article examines orders recently decided in the District of Kansas to show, circumstantially, that Kansas police are using fog-line traffic infractions as an excuse to stop out-of-state cars driven by people of Hispanic ethnicity and to investigate for drug trafficking. If a stop uncovers contraband, the defendant is charged with a crime, sometimes in federal court. At a subsequent hearing to evaluate a defendant’s motion to suppress the contraband, the officer testifies to his reason for the stop – “You crossed the fog line,” “drifted from your lane of travel,” or “failed to maintain a single lane.” The officer typically makes no mention of the reasons for selecting this particular car for careful scrutiny. Given the limited data, t...
It is settled law that an officer may initiate a traffic stop when there is articulable and reasonab...
A moving-violation traffic stop is pretextual when it is motivated by suspicion of an unrelated crim...
Much of our Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is premised upon a profound misunderstanding of the natur...
In Whren, the United States Supreme Court sanctioned pretextual traffic stops. In practice the holdi...
Fog line litigation is happening all across the country. For years, law enforcement officers across ...
Whren v. United States clarified the Supreme Court’s support of the practice of pretextual stops—usi...
When told that crossing the fog line is not sufficient grounds for a traffic stop in Missouri, most ...
This Article empirically illustrates that legal doctrines permitting police officers to engage in pr...
American states and municipalities have so many minor traffic regulations that every time a driver g...
The protections of the Fourth Amendment on the streets and highways of America have been drastically...
This article discusses the Supreme Court\u27s failure to provide a clear and effective remedy for di...
This Article analyzes Kansas v. Glover, in which the Supreme Court ruled that an officer could stop ...
In Whren v. United States, the Supreme Court held that pretextual traffic stops do not raise Fourth ...
The much-discussed Arizona immigration statute, SB 1070, continues an effort—this time at the legisl...
This short paper focuses on whether the Fourth Amendment permits police, during a routine traffic st...
It is settled law that an officer may initiate a traffic stop when there is articulable and reasonab...
A moving-violation traffic stop is pretextual when it is motivated by suspicion of an unrelated crim...
Much of our Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is premised upon a profound misunderstanding of the natur...
In Whren, the United States Supreme Court sanctioned pretextual traffic stops. In practice the holdi...
Fog line litigation is happening all across the country. For years, law enforcement officers across ...
Whren v. United States clarified the Supreme Court’s support of the practice of pretextual stops—usi...
When told that crossing the fog line is not sufficient grounds for a traffic stop in Missouri, most ...
This Article empirically illustrates that legal doctrines permitting police officers to engage in pr...
American states and municipalities have so many minor traffic regulations that every time a driver g...
The protections of the Fourth Amendment on the streets and highways of America have been drastically...
This article discusses the Supreme Court\u27s failure to provide a clear and effective remedy for di...
This Article analyzes Kansas v. Glover, in which the Supreme Court ruled that an officer could stop ...
In Whren v. United States, the Supreme Court held that pretextual traffic stops do not raise Fourth ...
The much-discussed Arizona immigration statute, SB 1070, continues an effort—this time at the legisl...
This short paper focuses on whether the Fourth Amendment permits police, during a routine traffic st...
It is settled law that an officer may initiate a traffic stop when there is articulable and reasonab...
A moving-violation traffic stop is pretextual when it is motivated by suspicion of an unrelated crim...
Much of our Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is premised upon a profound misunderstanding of the natur...