(Spa) En este trabajo, propongo una reconstrucción del argumento de Aristóteles en el capítulo 5 de Metafísica Z y defiendo una nueva lectura de cómo las objeciones desarrolladas en 1030b14-36 en contra de la posibilidad de definir predicados no-substanciales se relacionan entre sí.(Eng) In this paper, I offer a reconstruction of the argument of Aristotle in chapter 5 of Metaphysics Z and put forward a new interpretation of how his objections at 1030b14-36 against the possibility of defining non-substantial predicates are related to each other
It is common to think of essence along modal lines: the essential truths, on this approach, are a su...
The main aim of my work – “Matter and Explanation. On Aristotle's Metaphysics Book Η” – is to show t...
Aristotle is what we might call a constituent ontologist. At least, in the Physics and, especially, ...
(Spa) En este trabajo, propongo una reconstrucción del argumento de Aristóteles en el capítulo 5 d...
In this paper, I offer a reconstruction of the argument of Aristotle in chapter 5of Metaphysics Z an...
This book discusses Aristotle’s notions of essence and substance as they are developed in Metaphysic...
According to M. Wedin, R. M. Dancy and C. Kirwan, Aristotle does not restrict the range of the Prin...
In the Categories Aristotle claims that substances may be the subjects of true predications, but tha...
In the Categories, Aristotle recognizes two relations that an entity can bear to a subject: it can e...
M. Wedin, R. M. Dancy y C. Kirwan sostuvieron que Aristóteles no restringe el dominio del principio ...
Book Z of the Metaphysics of Aristotle focuses on the idea of the subject, which is one of the sens...
I discuss Aristotle's treatment of essence and definition in Metaphysics VII.4. I argue that it is ...
Strawson famously classified Aristotle as a descriptive metaphysician, alongside himself, and in con...
I argue that H 6 should be taken as Aristotle\u27s clarification on the causelessness in the unity o...
I discuss Aristotle’s views in Metaphysics VII-6 (Z-6) on the issue whether each thing is the same a...
It is common to think of essence along modal lines: the essential truths, on this approach, are a su...
The main aim of my work – “Matter and Explanation. On Aristotle's Metaphysics Book Η” – is to show t...
Aristotle is what we might call a constituent ontologist. At least, in the Physics and, especially, ...
(Spa) En este trabajo, propongo una reconstrucción del argumento de Aristóteles en el capítulo 5 d...
In this paper, I offer a reconstruction of the argument of Aristotle in chapter 5of Metaphysics Z an...
This book discusses Aristotle’s notions of essence and substance as they are developed in Metaphysic...
According to M. Wedin, R. M. Dancy and C. Kirwan, Aristotle does not restrict the range of the Prin...
In the Categories Aristotle claims that substances may be the subjects of true predications, but tha...
In the Categories, Aristotle recognizes two relations that an entity can bear to a subject: it can e...
M. Wedin, R. M. Dancy y C. Kirwan sostuvieron que Aristóteles no restringe el dominio del principio ...
Book Z of the Metaphysics of Aristotle focuses on the idea of the subject, which is one of the sens...
I discuss Aristotle's treatment of essence and definition in Metaphysics VII.4. I argue that it is ...
Strawson famously classified Aristotle as a descriptive metaphysician, alongside himself, and in con...
I argue that H 6 should be taken as Aristotle\u27s clarification on the causelessness in the unity o...
I discuss Aristotle’s views in Metaphysics VII-6 (Z-6) on the issue whether each thing is the same a...
It is common to think of essence along modal lines: the essential truths, on this approach, are a su...
The main aim of my work – “Matter and Explanation. On Aristotle's Metaphysics Book Η” – is to show t...
Aristotle is what we might call a constituent ontologist. At least, in the Physics and, especially, ...