Add to ORKGDuring the last quarter of a century, litigation in United States courts to address human rights abuses that occur beyond the shores of the United States has increased dramatically
Within the United States, states are the source of remedies for most legal wrongs. State law provide...
If American citizens or corporations commit gross violations of human rights against foreign victims...
The brief symposium contribution explores human rights litigation in U.S. state courts under state l...
During the last quarter of a century, litigation in United States courts to address hum...
The article focuses on uses Alien Tort Statute as a vehicle for litigating human rights abuses in bo...
This Article begins from the premise that the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) no longer serves a useful pur...
International human rights litigation in US courts largely began in 1980, with the Second Circuit\u2...
U.S. foreign policy--under every Administration--involves promoting respect for human rights around ...
Judge Kaufman held in a 1980 decision that a non-US citizen could file civil suits in the U.S. for h...
A quarter century ago, the prospects for federal civil litigation of international human rights viol...
This Comment examines whether the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act is amenable to the claims of alie...
There was virtually no dissent, judicially or politically, to opening the federal courts to foreign ...
To function with adequate predictability and efficiency, the international community must maintain o...
In human rights litigation, there are no formal standards to guide lawyers and their clients when t...
It has been twenty years since the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its landmark de...
Within the United States, states are the source of remedies for most legal wrongs. State law provide...
If American citizens or corporations commit gross violations of human rights against foreign victims...
The brief symposium contribution explores human rights litigation in U.S. state courts under state l...
During the last quarter of a century, litigation in United States courts to address hum...
The article focuses on uses Alien Tort Statute as a vehicle for litigating human rights abuses in bo...
This Article begins from the premise that the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) no longer serves a useful pur...
International human rights litigation in US courts largely began in 1980, with the Second Circuit\u2...
U.S. foreign policy--under every Administration--involves promoting respect for human rights around ...
Judge Kaufman held in a 1980 decision that a non-US citizen could file civil suits in the U.S. for h...
A quarter century ago, the prospects for federal civil litigation of international human rights viol...
This Comment examines whether the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act is amenable to the claims of alie...
There was virtually no dissent, judicially or politically, to opening the federal courts to foreign ...
To function with adequate predictability and efficiency, the international community must maintain o...
In human rights litigation, there are no formal standards to guide lawyers and their clients when t...
It has been twenty years since the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its landmark de...
Within the United States, states are the source of remedies for most legal wrongs. State law provide...
If American citizens or corporations commit gross violations of human rights against foreign victims...
The brief symposium contribution explores human rights litigation in U.S. state courts under state l...