American law schools use appellate court decisions to teach the implementation and progression of the law. Typically, the first case in a series will stand for the proposition that a plaintiff is entitled to a certain right. A later case demonstrates that a subsequent plaintiff is also entitled to the right. After a number of cases are presented, the student is expected to understand the law, policy, doctrine or test that applies to situations revolving around the right
There is an international human rights law aspect to Grutter v. Bollinger 1 and Gratz v. Bollinger 2...
Human rights are among society’s most powerful ideals. The notion that all people have rights, simpl...
Historically, international law consisted primarily of substantive norms, leaving it to individual n...
American law schools use appellate court decisions to teach the implementation and progression of th...
The United Nations has added new complications to the well-worn subject of treaties and the Constitu...
This was the background of the Akron symposium on human rights as comparative constitutional law. Th...
In this Article, Judge Schwebel reviews the cases of the International Court of Justice and its pred...
This article will catalogue the various contexts in which United States courts have agreed or refuse...
Adoption of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights created a new international...
Human rights are among society’s most powerful ideals. The notion that all people have rights, simpl...
Early in the history of the United States, human rights, then often termed the rights of man, were...
Human rights are among society’s most powerful ideals. The notion that all people have rights, simpl...
International treaty law occupies a more secure place in U.S. constitutional text than customary int...
This article provides a substantive discussion of international human rights law and how it can be u...
International human rights law may give rise to domestically enforceable rights. The Note traces the...
There is an international human rights law aspect to Grutter v. Bollinger 1 and Gratz v. Bollinger 2...
Human rights are among society’s most powerful ideals. The notion that all people have rights, simpl...
Historically, international law consisted primarily of substantive norms, leaving it to individual n...
American law schools use appellate court decisions to teach the implementation and progression of th...
The United Nations has added new complications to the well-worn subject of treaties and the Constitu...
This was the background of the Akron symposium on human rights as comparative constitutional law. Th...
In this Article, Judge Schwebel reviews the cases of the International Court of Justice and its pred...
This article will catalogue the various contexts in which United States courts have agreed or refuse...
Adoption of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights created a new international...
Human rights are among society’s most powerful ideals. The notion that all people have rights, simpl...
Early in the history of the United States, human rights, then often termed the rights of man, were...
Human rights are among society’s most powerful ideals. The notion that all people have rights, simpl...
International treaty law occupies a more secure place in U.S. constitutional text than customary int...
This article provides a substantive discussion of international human rights law and how it can be u...
International human rights law may give rise to domestically enforceable rights. The Note traces the...
There is an international human rights law aspect to Grutter v. Bollinger 1 and Gratz v. Bollinger 2...
Human rights are among society’s most powerful ideals. The notion that all people have rights, simpl...
Historically, international law consisted primarily of substantive norms, leaving it to individual n...