The creation of a European criminal law code is a complex and, to a certain extent unpopular issue. It is complex because it suggests harmonisation of national substantial and procedural criminal law systems and unpopular amongst Member States because indeed harmonisation of criminal law is utterly sensitive, displaying one of the last corners of Member States’ sovereignty. The Lisbon Treaty has provided the European Union (EU) with new competences in the area of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and law enforcement cooperation as this area has now become an area of shared competences with the Member States. Two important questions arise from these new competences. First, does the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU...
Current legislative activity of the European Union performed under Title V, Chapter 4 of the Treaty ...
The establishment of a common European space of the Member States from an economic and judicial poin...
The European harmonisation of national criminal legislations seems not limited to their special part...
The creation of a European criminal law code is a complex and, to a certain extent unpopular issue. ...
EU founding states aimed the establishment of an economic and political organism. Economic and polit...
Since the entry into force of the Maastricht Treaty in 1993 the harmonization1 of substantive penal...
Same as EU Law, that presents a new area of law and that it is still in progress, the EU Criminal La...
This paper seeks to shed some light on the nature, scope and impact of harmonisation of national cri...
Europeanisation of Criminal Law Summary Throught the use of common adaptation of the basic principle...
1 Abstract - Europeanisation of Criminal Law The Europeanization of criminal law is a convergent pro...
Article 83(2) TFEU, introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, confers a power on the EU to harmonise Membe...
Criminal law at the European Union level has traditionally been dealt through the concept of intergo...
The allocation by the Lisbon Treaty of a genuine criminalisation competence to the Union – article 8...
Current legislative activity of the European Union performed under Title V, Chapter 4 of the Treaty ...
At a European inter-state level, both the Council of Europe and the European Union (EU) have develop...
Current legislative activity of the European Union performed under Title V, Chapter 4 of the Treaty ...
The establishment of a common European space of the Member States from an economic and judicial poin...
The European harmonisation of national criminal legislations seems not limited to their special part...
The creation of a European criminal law code is a complex and, to a certain extent unpopular issue. ...
EU founding states aimed the establishment of an economic and political organism. Economic and polit...
Since the entry into force of the Maastricht Treaty in 1993 the harmonization1 of substantive penal...
Same as EU Law, that presents a new area of law and that it is still in progress, the EU Criminal La...
This paper seeks to shed some light on the nature, scope and impact of harmonisation of national cri...
Europeanisation of Criminal Law Summary Throught the use of common adaptation of the basic principle...
1 Abstract - Europeanisation of Criminal Law The Europeanization of criminal law is a convergent pro...
Article 83(2) TFEU, introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, confers a power on the EU to harmonise Membe...
Criminal law at the European Union level has traditionally been dealt through the concept of intergo...
The allocation by the Lisbon Treaty of a genuine criminalisation competence to the Union – article 8...
Current legislative activity of the European Union performed under Title V, Chapter 4 of the Treaty ...
At a European inter-state level, both the Council of Europe and the European Union (EU) have develop...
Current legislative activity of the European Union performed under Title V, Chapter 4 of the Treaty ...
The establishment of a common European space of the Member States from an economic and judicial poin...
The European harmonisation of national criminal legislations seems not limited to their special part...