We identify new conditions ensuring risk aversion in the sense of Arrow–Pratt in a two-argument utility framework in which a financial risk is accompanied by a background risk. Our results generalize the findings of Finkelshtain et al. (1999). We consider a sequence of possible dependence among risks. We also provide an empirical example showing that second-order expectation dependence cannot be ignored in determining risk aversion with two risks
89 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1988.The Arrow-Pratt analysis of ri...
The risk premium is affected by loss aversion and probability distortions as well as utility curvatu...
We present a dual formulation of choice under uncertainty based on a few simple assumptions about pr...
International audienceWe consider necessary and sufficient conditions for risk aversion to one risk ...
We examine the demand for a risky asset in the presence of two risks: a financial risk and a backgro...
Expected utility functions are limited to second-order (conditional) risk aversion, while non-expect...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
Abstract: In the literature, utility functions in the expected utility class are generically limited...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
Expected utility functions are limited to second-order (conditional) risk aversion, while non-expect...
In this paper, it is shown that, for a wide range of risk-averse generalized expected utility prefer...
In the literature, utility functions in the expected utility class are generically limited to second...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
In the literature, utility functions in the expected utility class are generically limited to second...
The decision-making situation under risk is defined and the certainty equivalent of a lottery with u...
89 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1988.The Arrow-Pratt analysis of ri...
The risk premium is affected by loss aversion and probability distortions as well as utility curvatu...
We present a dual formulation of choice under uncertainty based on a few simple assumptions about pr...
International audienceWe consider necessary and sufficient conditions for risk aversion to one risk ...
We examine the demand for a risky asset in the presence of two risks: a financial risk and a backgro...
Expected utility functions are limited to second-order (conditional) risk aversion, while non-expect...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
Abstract: In the literature, utility functions in the expected utility class are generically limited...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
Expected utility functions are limited to second-order (conditional) risk aversion, while non-expect...
In this paper, it is shown that, for a wide range of risk-averse generalized expected utility prefer...
In the literature, utility functions in the expected utility class are generically limited to second...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
In the literature, utility functions in the expected utility class are generically limited to second...
The decision-making situation under risk is defined and the certainty equivalent of a lottery with u...
89 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1988.The Arrow-Pratt analysis of ri...
The risk premium is affected by loss aversion and probability distortions as well as utility curvatu...
We present a dual formulation of choice under uncertainty based on a few simple assumptions about pr...