This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a background risk. Although the literature covers this question extensively, our contribution differs from most of the literature in two respects. First, background risk does not need to be additive or multiplicative. Second, the two risks are not necessary mean independent, and may be quadrant dependent. We show that our order of cross Ross risk aversion is equivalent to that of partial risk premium, while our index of decreasing cross Ross risk aversion is equivalent to that of a decreasing partial risk premium. These results generalize the comparative risk aversion model developed by Ross (1981) for mean independent risks. Finally, we show that dec...
The risk premium is affected by loss aversion and probability distortions as well as utility curvatu...
International audienceWe consider necessary and sufficient conditions for risk aversion to one risk ...
In this paper, it is shown that, for a wide range of risk-averse generalized expected utility prefer...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
We provide comparative global conditions for downside risk aversion, which are similar to the ones s...
At first glance, there would appear to be no relationship between Bell’s (1988) concept of one-switc...
We define decreasing higher-degree Ross risk aversion and provide an intuitive interpretation for it...
We provide comparative global conditions for downside risk aversion, which are similar to the ones s...
Abstract: In the framework of expected utility, nth-degree risk aversion/loving is unequivocally ch...
In this paper we propose the infimum of the Arrow-Pratt index of absolute risk aversion as a measure...
The decision-making situation under risk is defined and the certainty equivalent of a lottery with u...
We identify new conditions ensuring risk aversion in the sense of Arrow–Pratt in a two-argument util...
Working paper GATE 2011-19An article about Kihlstrom and Mirman about comparative risk aversion with...
The effects of multivariate risk are examined in a model of portfolio choice. The conditions under w...
The risk premium is affected by loss aversion and probability distortions as well as utility curvatu...
International audienceWe consider necessary and sufficient conditions for risk aversion to one risk ...
In this paper, it is shown that, for a wide range of risk-averse generalized expected utility prefer...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
This paper studies comparative risk aversion between risk averse agents in the presence of a backgro...
We provide comparative global conditions for downside risk aversion, which are similar to the ones s...
At first glance, there would appear to be no relationship between Bell’s (1988) concept of one-switc...
We define decreasing higher-degree Ross risk aversion and provide an intuitive interpretation for it...
We provide comparative global conditions for downside risk aversion, which are similar to the ones s...
Abstract: In the framework of expected utility, nth-degree risk aversion/loving is unequivocally ch...
In this paper we propose the infimum of the Arrow-Pratt index of absolute risk aversion as a measure...
The decision-making situation under risk is defined and the certainty equivalent of a lottery with u...
We identify new conditions ensuring risk aversion in the sense of Arrow–Pratt in a two-argument util...
Working paper GATE 2011-19An article about Kihlstrom and Mirman about comparative risk aversion with...
The effects of multivariate risk are examined in a model of portfolio choice. The conditions under w...
The risk premium is affected by loss aversion and probability distortions as well as utility curvatu...
International audienceWe consider necessary and sufficient conditions for risk aversion to one risk ...
In this paper, it is shown that, for a wide range of risk-averse generalized expected utility prefer...