Cronyism in firms arises when favoritism toward an ingroup affects personnel decisions. Two main motives underlie cronyism: profit, if an ingroup employee works harder; or altruism, if used to transfer resources. In a lab-experiment trust game with naturally-occurring groups, an employer (proposer) faces an employee (responder) who is or is not an ingroup member. We see that both motives play a role. Cronyism is more likely from employers who are more altruistic to the ingroup in a dictator game; and even low-productivity (by design) ingroup members reciprocate trust generously. Cronyism pays for those who engage in it
Background: Indirect reciprocity is a mechanism for cooperation in social dilemma situations. In ind...
We provide experimental evidence of workers' ingratiation by opinion conformity and of managers' dis...
Identity is a central concept in the social sciences. In this study, we present a laboratory experi-...
In this paper, we examine labor market favoritism in a unique laboratory experiment design that can ...
International audienceIn this paper, we examine labor market favoritism in a unique laboratory exper...
Although theory suggests individuals are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroup me...
Research on groups in organizations has regularly identified the presence of favoritism toward membe...
International audienceWe study within one theoretical framework two related phenomena – ingratiation...
To what extent is the tendency to act more prosocially towards ingroup than outgroup members a 'defa...
AbstractIndirect reciprocity in which players cooperate with unacquainted other players having good ...
We experimentally study how people resolve a tension between favoritism and fairness when allocating...
We examine both the private benefits and spillover costs of labor market favoritism in a unique labo...
Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship ...
Ingroup favoritism—the tendency to favor members of one’s own group over those in other groups—is we...
Favoritism is the act of offering jobs, contracts and resources to members of one’s social group in ...
Background: Indirect reciprocity is a mechanism for cooperation in social dilemma situations. In ind...
We provide experimental evidence of workers' ingratiation by opinion conformity and of managers' dis...
Identity is a central concept in the social sciences. In this study, we present a laboratory experi-...
In this paper, we examine labor market favoritism in a unique laboratory experiment design that can ...
International audienceIn this paper, we examine labor market favoritism in a unique laboratory exper...
Although theory suggests individuals are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroup me...
Research on groups in organizations has regularly identified the presence of favoritism toward membe...
International audienceWe study within one theoretical framework two related phenomena – ingratiation...
To what extent is the tendency to act more prosocially towards ingroup than outgroup members a 'defa...
AbstractIndirect reciprocity in which players cooperate with unacquainted other players having good ...
We experimentally study how people resolve a tension between favoritism and fairness when allocating...
We examine both the private benefits and spillover costs of labor market favoritism in a unique labo...
Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship ...
Ingroup favoritism—the tendency to favor members of one’s own group over those in other groups—is we...
Favoritism is the act of offering jobs, contracts and resources to members of one’s social group in ...
Background: Indirect reciprocity is a mechanism for cooperation in social dilemma situations. In ind...
We provide experimental evidence of workers' ingratiation by opinion conformity and of managers' dis...
Identity is a central concept in the social sciences. In this study, we present a laboratory experi-...