We experimentally study how people resolve a tension between favoritism and fairness when allocating a profit in a team production setting. Past research shows that people tend to favor their ingroup at the cost of an outgroup when allocating a given amount of money. However, when the money to be allocated depends on joint production, we find that most players allocate proportionally according to others’ relative contributions, irrespective of their social identity affiliations. We discuss the implications of our findings on how distributive norms could shape team cooperation
This paper examines two strands of literature regarding economic models of cooperation. First, payof...
We compare experimentally the revealed distributional preferences of individuals and teams in alloca...
While most papers on team decision-making find that teams behave more selfishly, less trustingly and...
We experimentally study how people resolve a tension between favoritism and fairness when allocating...
We investigate the impact of inequality on sharing and cooperation using a dictator game and a linea...
Common identity and peer punishment have been identified as important means to reduce free riding an...
Although theory suggests individuals are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroup me...
révision Août 2015We compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both within- a...
The notions of one’s social identity, group membership, and homophily have recentlybecome topics for...
This dissertation examines the effects of social identity in an economic context. The first chapter...
Norms can promote human cooperation to provide public goods. Yet, the potential of norms to promote ...
International audienceWe compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both withi...
To what extent is the tendency to act more prosocially towards ingroup than outgroup members a 'defa...
We use experiments to compare two institutions for allocating the proceeds of team production.Under ...
In the theories of team reasoning of Sugden, and Bacharach, players are assumed to be motivated in s...
This paper examines two strands of literature regarding economic models of cooperation. First, payof...
We compare experimentally the revealed distributional preferences of individuals and teams in alloca...
While most papers on team decision-making find that teams behave more selfishly, less trustingly and...
We experimentally study how people resolve a tension between favoritism and fairness when allocating...
We investigate the impact of inequality on sharing and cooperation using a dictator game and a linea...
Common identity and peer punishment have been identified as important means to reduce free riding an...
Although theory suggests individuals are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroup me...
révision Août 2015We compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both within- a...
The notions of one’s social identity, group membership, and homophily have recentlybecome topics for...
This dissertation examines the effects of social identity in an economic context. The first chapter...
Norms can promote human cooperation to provide public goods. Yet, the potential of norms to promote ...
International audienceWe compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both withi...
To what extent is the tendency to act more prosocially towards ingroup than outgroup members a 'defa...
We use experiments to compare two institutions for allocating the proceeds of team production.Under ...
In the theories of team reasoning of Sugden, and Bacharach, players are assumed to be motivated in s...
This paper examines two strands of literature regarding economic models of cooperation. First, payof...
We compare experimentally the revealed distributional preferences of individuals and teams in alloca...
While most papers on team decision-making find that teams behave more selfishly, less trustingly and...