In a winner-take-all duopoly market for systems in which firms invest to improve their products, a vertically integrated monopoly supplier of an essential system component may have an incentive to advantage itself by technological tying; that is, by designing the component to work better in its own system. If the vertically integrated firm is prevented from technologically tying, then there is an equilibrium in which the more efficient firm invests and serves the entire market. However, another equilibrium may exist in which the less efficient firm invests and captures the market. Technological tying enables a vertically integrated firm to foreclose its rival. The welfare implications of technological tying are ambiguous and depend on the a...
We study the licensing incentives of an independent input producer owning a patented product innovat...
Chapter I analyzes a product innovation and licensing game between an incumbent and a potential non-...
How does market structure affect quality innovation efforts and so-cial welfare? This study consider...
In a winner-take-all duopoly for systems in which firms invest to improve their products, a vertical...
In a winner-take-all duopoly for systems in which firms invest to improve their products, a vertical...
In a winner-take-all duopoly market for systems in which firms invest to improve their products, a m...
Preliminary and incomplete draft. Please do not quote, cite, or circulate without permission. In a m...
We model an oligopolistic technology market in which firms endogenously choose product scope, fixed ...
Unlike Arrows result for process innovations, we show that the gain from a product innovation can be...
Unlike Arrows result for process innovations, the gain from a product innovation can be larger to a ...
Unlike Arrow’s result for process innovations, we show that the gain from a product innovation can b...
The incentives to innovate for the incumbent and the entrant in a vertically differentiated market a...
Arrow (1962) showed that a secure monopolist (unconcerned with preemption) has a weaker incentive th...
We study the licensing incentives of an independent input producer owning a patented product innovat...
We study the licensing incentives of an independent input producer owning a patented product innovat...
We study the licensing incentives of an independent input producer owning a patented product innovat...
Chapter I analyzes a product innovation and licensing game between an incumbent and a potential non-...
How does market structure affect quality innovation efforts and so-cial welfare? This study consider...
In a winner-take-all duopoly for systems in which firms invest to improve their products, a vertical...
In a winner-take-all duopoly for systems in which firms invest to improve their products, a vertical...
In a winner-take-all duopoly market for systems in which firms invest to improve their products, a m...
Preliminary and incomplete draft. Please do not quote, cite, or circulate without permission. In a m...
We model an oligopolistic technology market in which firms endogenously choose product scope, fixed ...
Unlike Arrows result for process innovations, we show that the gain from a product innovation can be...
Unlike Arrows result for process innovations, the gain from a product innovation can be larger to a ...
Unlike Arrow’s result for process innovations, we show that the gain from a product innovation can b...
The incentives to innovate for the incumbent and the entrant in a vertically differentiated market a...
Arrow (1962) showed that a secure monopolist (unconcerned with preemption) has a weaker incentive th...
We study the licensing incentives of an independent input producer owning a patented product innovat...
We study the licensing incentives of an independent input producer owning a patented product innovat...
We study the licensing incentives of an independent input producer owning a patented product innovat...
Chapter I analyzes a product innovation and licensing game between an incumbent and a potential non-...
How does market structure affect quality innovation efforts and so-cial welfare? This study consider...