This paper describes the specific contexts in which evidentials may be used in Lhasa Tibetan. I first give a brief presentation of the notion of evidentiality in interaction with pragmatics, which has been mainly used for describing Lhasa Tibetan. Then I re-evaluate the analysis of the evidential verb system in Lhasa Tibetan. I show there are indeed eight evidentials. I only focus on the six first evidentials: egophoric, sensorial, factual, inferential, mnemic and self-corrective with controllable verbs. The two other evidentials are the quotative and the hearsay particles.Then, I focus on the specific functions of the evidentials with controllable verbs. I present the use of the intentional egophoric with the non-SAP and controllable verbs...
Lamjung Yolmo is a Tibeto-Burman language of the Bodish branch spoken in Nepal. Like related languag...
In the Akha language - a Tibeto-Burman language - marking of evidentiality is obligatory. The eviden...
Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1985), pp. 65-7
This paper describes the specific contexts in which evidentials may be used in Lhasa Tibetan. I firs...
This edited volume brings together work on the evidential systems of Tibetan languages. This include...
The Tibetan evidential system seems to defy systematic analysis. Each evidential category comprises ...
Evidentiality is a grammatical category which has source of\ud information as its primary meaning — ...
Evidentiality is a grammatical category which has source of information as its primary meaning — whe...
We describe the nature of the evidential system in Tibetan and consider the challenges that any evid...
The main purpose of this paper is to elucidate a special type of egophoric markers found in Purik an...
Classifications of evidentiality all include at least one ‘reported’, ‘quotative’ or ‘hearsay’ categ...
A speaker may conceptualise and represent a situation from three different ‘perspectives’: epistemic...
Evidentiality is “the linguistic means of indicating how the speaker obtained the information on whi...
A diachronic study of the development of modern aspect and evidential morphology in standard Lhasa T...
This paper focuses on a specific type of perspective-indexing constructions in Tibetic and neighbori...
Lamjung Yolmo is a Tibeto-Burman language of the Bodish branch spoken in Nepal. Like related languag...
In the Akha language - a Tibeto-Burman language - marking of evidentiality is obligatory. The eviden...
Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1985), pp. 65-7
This paper describes the specific contexts in which evidentials may be used in Lhasa Tibetan. I firs...
This edited volume brings together work on the evidential systems of Tibetan languages. This include...
The Tibetan evidential system seems to defy systematic analysis. Each evidential category comprises ...
Evidentiality is a grammatical category which has source of\ud information as its primary meaning — ...
Evidentiality is a grammatical category which has source of information as its primary meaning — whe...
We describe the nature of the evidential system in Tibetan and consider the challenges that any evid...
The main purpose of this paper is to elucidate a special type of egophoric markers found in Purik an...
Classifications of evidentiality all include at least one ‘reported’, ‘quotative’ or ‘hearsay’ categ...
A speaker may conceptualise and represent a situation from three different ‘perspectives’: epistemic...
Evidentiality is “the linguistic means of indicating how the speaker obtained the information on whi...
A diachronic study of the development of modern aspect and evidential morphology in standard Lhasa T...
This paper focuses on a specific type of perspective-indexing constructions in Tibetic and neighbori...
Lamjung Yolmo is a Tibeto-Burman language of the Bodish branch spoken in Nepal. Like related languag...
In the Akha language - a Tibeto-Burman language - marking of evidentiality is obligatory. The eviden...
Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1985), pp. 65-7