Add to ORKGApplication of water to a beneficial use is the decisive element of a perfected water right in Montana. The BLM claimed rights to five reservoirs and one natural pothole under Montana law. The agency did not own livestock, but instead made the water available to grazing permittees. In United States v. Barthelmess Ranch Corp., the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the Montana Water Court’s holding that the BLM’s practice of making water available to others constituted a beneficial use and a perfected water right
Public Water, Private Rights: All Are Not Equally Protected When The State Allows Some To Divert Sma...
In re Crow Water Compact is the second appeal from the Crow Water Compact, agreed upon by the Settli...
This article examines preliminary rulings by the Special Master in Montana v. Wyoming, a Supreme Cou...
Application of water to a beneficial use is the decisive element of a perfected water right in Monta...
Did the Water Court err in granting partial summary judgment to the United States as claimant of sta...
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the law requiring that applicants for new ground water permits in c...
Attempts to alter water use agreements, especially those spanning back decades or even centuries, el...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
In 2007, Montana filed an original action with the United States Supreme Court asserting that certai...
Before landowners may appropriate groundwater in Montana, they must first apply for a DNRC permit pu...
Did the Water Court err when it ruled water rights for the purpose of sale or rental are not limited...
Access to water defines the arid American West and water management is an explicit effort to balance...
With fewer than a million people, Montana is one of the last states to tackle some problems that acc...
Adjudication of Indian Water Rights: Implementation of the 1979 Amendments to the Water Use Ac
Public Water, Private Rights: All Are Not Equally Protected When The State Allows Some To Divert Sma...
In re Crow Water Compact is the second appeal from the Crow Water Compact, agreed upon by the Settli...
This article examines preliminary rulings by the Special Master in Montana v. Wyoming, a Supreme Cou...
Application of water to a beneficial use is the decisive element of a perfected water right in Monta...
Did the Water Court err in granting partial summary judgment to the United States as claimant of sta...
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the law requiring that applicants for new ground water permits in c...
Attempts to alter water use agreements, especially those spanning back decades or even centuries, el...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
In 2007, Montana filed an original action with the United States Supreme Court asserting that certai...
Before landowners may appropriate groundwater in Montana, they must first apply for a DNRC permit pu...
Did the Water Court err when it ruled water rights for the purpose of sale or rental are not limited...
Access to water defines the arid American West and water management is an explicit effort to balance...
With fewer than a million people, Montana is one of the last states to tackle some problems that acc...
Adjudication of Indian Water Rights: Implementation of the 1979 Amendments to the Water Use Ac
Public Water, Private Rights: All Are Not Equally Protected When The State Allows Some To Divert Sma...
In re Crow Water Compact is the second appeal from the Crow Water Compact, agreed upon by the Settli...
This article examines preliminary rulings by the Special Master in Montana v. Wyoming, a Supreme Cou...