The Montana Supreme Court upheld the law requiring that applicants for new ground water permits in closed basins show no net surface depletion and that the new appropriation will not adversely affect senior water appropriators. Where the relationship between surface and ground water is uncertain or attenuated, applicants still bear the burden of proof, even if the proposed use constitutes only a de minimis quantity. Once again, the Court acknowledged the hydrologic connection between surface and ground water and the underlying legal framework which seeks to make water available for new appropriation and simultaneously protect the water rights of senior appropriators through the prior appropriation doctrine
Whether the district court erred in concluding that municipal ownership of Missoula’s water system i...
On January 16, 2014, the Supreme Court of Montana reversed and remanded a district court decision th...
On appeal from the Park County District Court, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the Park Conservatio...
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the law requiring that applicants for new ground water permits in c...
Before landowners may appropriate groundwater in Montana, they must first apply for a DNRC permit pu...
Application of water to a beneficial use is the decisive element of a perfected water right in Monta...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
After twenty years of adjudication, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the City of Helena’s right to...
In 2007, Montana filed an original action with the United States Supreme Court asserting that certai...
Did the district court err in ruling that an administrative rule defining “combined appropriation” c...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
In Bitterrooters for Planning, Inc. v. Montana Department of Environmental Quality, the Montana Supr...
This article examines preliminary rulings by the Special Master in Montana v. Wyoming, a Supreme Cou...
In MEIC II, the Montana Supreme Court held MEIC’s claims regarding the extent of reclamation require...
Hecla Mining Company and its subsidiaries want to develop two industrial silver and copper mines––...
Whether the district court erred in concluding that municipal ownership of Missoula’s water system i...
On January 16, 2014, the Supreme Court of Montana reversed and remanded a district court decision th...
On appeal from the Park County District Court, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the Park Conservatio...
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the law requiring that applicants for new ground water permits in c...
Before landowners may appropriate groundwater in Montana, they must first apply for a DNRC permit pu...
Application of water to a beneficial use is the decisive element of a perfected water right in Monta...
Defendant landowners claimed possession of riparian lands bordering the Missouri River. However, the...
After twenty years of adjudication, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the City of Helena’s right to...
In 2007, Montana filed an original action with the United States Supreme Court asserting that certai...
Did the district court err in ruling that an administrative rule defining “combined appropriation” c...
The Western Montana Water Users challenged the authority of the Flathead Joint Control Board to ente...
In Bitterrooters for Planning, Inc. v. Montana Department of Environmental Quality, the Montana Supr...
This article examines preliminary rulings by the Special Master in Montana v. Wyoming, a Supreme Cou...
In MEIC II, the Montana Supreme Court held MEIC’s claims regarding the extent of reclamation require...
Hecla Mining Company and its subsidiaries want to develop two industrial silver and copper mines––...
Whether the district court erred in concluding that municipal ownership of Missoula’s water system i...
On January 16, 2014, the Supreme Court of Montana reversed and remanded a district court decision th...
On appeal from the Park County District Court, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the Park Conservatio...