Mr. Silverberg’s comment stresses that the proponents of the legalization of marijuana have not been able to convince Congress to legalize it, and so it is appropriate for Congress to penalize trafficking in that drug. Apparently, he sees our contention that the penalty adopted in I.R.C. § 280E is irrational and contravenes established punitive jurisprudence as a backdoor attempt to accomplish indirectly, by weakening the penalties on the marijuana businesses, what has not been able to be accomplished by those seeking its federal legalization. That was not the motive for our proposal and is not a fair reading of our Prompt
This article considers several issues affecting Internal Revenue Code section 280E, which denies inc...
With many firms practicing in multiple states, a lawyer could represent a marijuana dispensary in a ...
This Comment contends that because of the continuing legislative inability to deal adequately with t...
Mr. Silverberg’s comment stresses that the proponents of the legalization of marijuana have not been...
Mr. Pullin’s thesis is that marijuana should be excluded from § 280E when it is operated legally und...
Currently, twenty-eight states and the District of Columbia allow the use of marijuana for medical p...
Despite marijuana’s varying levels of legalization in thirty-three states, the U.S. federal governme...
Congress enacted § 280E of the Internal Revenue Code in 1982 to punish businesses engaged in illegal...
Although some ingenious solutions have been proposed to the problems posed by Section 280E pf the fe...
The federal income tax law denies a deduction for illegal expenses, for any expense (legal or otherw...
26 pagesThis comment argues that chapter 12 bankruptcy and the enjoinment of funds for Department of...
The article does not discuss the arguments in favor of decriminalization, a matter which the author\...
This Comment analyzes the constitutionality and impact of the Executive Branch\u27s decision to not ...
Marijuana is legal for either medicinal or recreational use in many states. However, the cultivation...
Professor Bolitho discusses why the Justice Department\u27s policy on marijuana over the past eight ...
This article considers several issues affecting Internal Revenue Code section 280E, which denies inc...
With many firms practicing in multiple states, a lawyer could represent a marijuana dispensary in a ...
This Comment contends that because of the continuing legislative inability to deal adequately with t...
Mr. Silverberg’s comment stresses that the proponents of the legalization of marijuana have not been...
Mr. Pullin’s thesis is that marijuana should be excluded from § 280E when it is operated legally und...
Currently, twenty-eight states and the District of Columbia allow the use of marijuana for medical p...
Despite marijuana’s varying levels of legalization in thirty-three states, the U.S. federal governme...
Congress enacted § 280E of the Internal Revenue Code in 1982 to punish businesses engaged in illegal...
Although some ingenious solutions have been proposed to the problems posed by Section 280E pf the fe...
The federal income tax law denies a deduction for illegal expenses, for any expense (legal or otherw...
26 pagesThis comment argues that chapter 12 bankruptcy and the enjoinment of funds for Department of...
The article does not discuss the arguments in favor of decriminalization, a matter which the author\...
This Comment analyzes the constitutionality and impact of the Executive Branch\u27s decision to not ...
Marijuana is legal for either medicinal or recreational use in many states. However, the cultivation...
Professor Bolitho discusses why the Justice Department\u27s policy on marijuana over the past eight ...
This article considers several issues affecting Internal Revenue Code section 280E, which denies inc...
With many firms practicing in multiple states, a lawyer could represent a marijuana dispensary in a ...
This Comment contends that because of the continuing legislative inability to deal adequately with t...