Methodological difficulties of social psychology with regard to grudged human rights

The authors in this article point at methodological omissions of work from social psychology, which wrongly concluded that religiosity and national exclusivism present united dimension of a person. That wrongly conclusion refers to human rights negatively. It is considered that religiosity influences to nationalism and ethnocentrism negatively. The authors refer to objective approach to the question of religiosity and that should be taken in consideration all important factors at research. For this reason would be necessery, they say, team work, then that in teams should be membars of different opinions and convictions, theists and atheists. They complain at some attitudes in our country which look at faith extremely ideological, negatively