In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) adding a convexe constraints on the solution. Through a sequence of approximating Hilbertian spaces and a discretized model, we prove that the Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) of the posterior distribution is exactly the optimal constrained smoothing function in the RKHS. This paper can be read as a generalization of the paper [7] of Kimeldorf-Wahba where it is proved that the optimal smoothing solution is the mean of the posterior distribution
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estima- tion and optimal smoothing in a...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estima- tion and optimal smoothing in a...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estima- tion and optimal smoothing in a...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estima- tion and optimal smoothing in a...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estima- tion and optimal smoothing in a...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estima- tion and optimal smoothing in a...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estima- tion and optimal smoothing in a...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estima- tion and optimal smoothing in a...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...
In this paper, we extend the correspondence between Bayesian estimation and optimal smoothing in a R...