Courts have long held that civil asset forfeiture falls under the police power exception to the automatic stay because of its goal to deter crime and the government’s presumed lack of monetary incentive. However, civil forfeiture has increasingly been criticized as excessive and unrestrained, while municipalities have been accused of utilizing it as a fundraising tool for law enforcement agencies. The author argues that civil asset forfeiture can unfairly punish the creditors in a bankruptcy proceeding and that, when the forfeiture constitutes an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment, the police power exception to the automatic stay should not apply
Civil asset forfeiture compromises criminal due process protections for the sake of allowing the gov...
In this Article, Messrs. Schwarcz and Rothman analyze the disquieting impact of civil forfeiture law...
All fifty states and the federal government have civil asset forfeiture laws that enable law enforce...
Courts have long held that civil asset forfeiture falls under the police power exception to the auto...
Civil asset forfeiture has strayed far from its intended purpose. Designed to give law enforcement p...
On February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in Timbs v. In...
Civil asset forfeiture laws permit police officers to seize property they suspect is connected to cr...
Purpose: Critics of asset forfeiture claim that forfeiture laws create financial incentives that ina...
Abstract. Civil asset forfeiture allows the police to profit from crime instead of the criminal by s...
In Timbs v. Indiana, Petitioner Tyson Timbs asks the Supreme Court to incorporate the Excessive Fine...
The federal government uses two general types of asset forfeiture, criminal and civil. This Article ...
(Excerpt) Under § 362(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, a party may bring a claim against a debtor despi...
Civil forfeiture laws permit the government to seize and forfeit private property that has allegedly...
Civil asset forfeiture allows police to seize a person\u27s cash and property without charging or co...
In 1971, agents of the federal government seized a $20,000 yaught after finding a small quantity of ...
Civil asset forfeiture compromises criminal due process protections for the sake of allowing the gov...
In this Article, Messrs. Schwarcz and Rothman analyze the disquieting impact of civil forfeiture law...
All fifty states and the federal government have civil asset forfeiture laws that enable law enforce...
Courts have long held that civil asset forfeiture falls under the police power exception to the auto...
Civil asset forfeiture has strayed far from its intended purpose. Designed to give law enforcement p...
On February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in Timbs v. In...
Civil asset forfeiture laws permit police officers to seize property they suspect is connected to cr...
Purpose: Critics of asset forfeiture claim that forfeiture laws create financial incentives that ina...
Abstract. Civil asset forfeiture allows the police to profit from crime instead of the criminal by s...
In Timbs v. Indiana, Petitioner Tyson Timbs asks the Supreme Court to incorporate the Excessive Fine...
The federal government uses two general types of asset forfeiture, criminal and civil. This Article ...
(Excerpt) Under § 362(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, a party may bring a claim against a debtor despi...
Civil forfeiture laws permit the government to seize and forfeit private property that has allegedly...
Civil asset forfeiture allows police to seize a person\u27s cash and property without charging or co...
In 1971, agents of the federal government seized a $20,000 yaught after finding a small quantity of ...
Civil asset forfeiture compromises criminal due process protections for the sake of allowing the gov...
In this Article, Messrs. Schwarcz and Rothman analyze the disquieting impact of civil forfeiture law...
All fifty states and the federal government have civil asset forfeiture laws that enable law enforce...