Add to ORKGA key contention of Klein & Barron (2016) is that consciousness does not depend on cortical structures. A critical appraisal suggests they have overestimated the strength of their evidence
Engel et al. (1999) claim that ‘‘appropriate synchronization among cortical neurons may be one of th...
According to higher-order thought accounts of phenomenal consciousness (e.g. Carruthers, 2000) it is...
Historically, the scientific and medical communities have taken a corticocentric view on consciousne...
A key contention of Klein & Barron (2016) is that consciousness does not depend on cortical structur...
In arguing that insect brains are capable of sentience, Klein & Barron rely heavily on Bjorn Merker’...
Although we admire Ned Block's effort to include cognitive neuroscience in his philosophical work, w...
Klein & Barron\u27s review of recent insect neurobiology helps correct the impression that insect be...
Consistent with the promising proposal of Klein & Barron (K & B), we discuss how what makes us consc...
Our target article, "Insects have the capacity for subjective experience," has provoked a diverse ra...
Klein & Barron’s (2016) (K & B’s) case for insect consciousness is a welcome development in an area ...
Our target article, “Insects have the capacity for subjective experience,” has provoked a diverse ra...
Item does not contain fulltextMerker suggests that the thalamocortical system is not an essential sy...
Although we are mostly supportive, we point out the strengths and weaknesses of Klein & Barron’s (20...
From the perspective of a comparative neuroanatomist studying the avian pallium, Woodruff’s (2017) c...
Klein & Barron’s (K & B’s) suggestion that insects have the capacity for phenomenal consciousness is...
Engel et al. (1999) claim that ‘‘appropriate synchronization among cortical neurons may be one of th...
According to higher-order thought accounts of phenomenal consciousness (e.g. Carruthers, 2000) it is...
Historically, the scientific and medical communities have taken a corticocentric view on consciousne...
A key contention of Klein & Barron (2016) is that consciousness does not depend on cortical structur...
In arguing that insect brains are capable of sentience, Klein & Barron rely heavily on Bjorn Merker’...
Although we admire Ned Block's effort to include cognitive neuroscience in his philosophical work, w...
Klein & Barron\u27s review of recent insect neurobiology helps correct the impression that insect be...
Consistent with the promising proposal of Klein & Barron (K & B), we discuss how what makes us consc...
Our target article, "Insects have the capacity for subjective experience," has provoked a diverse ra...
Klein & Barron’s (2016) (K & B’s) case for insect consciousness is a welcome development in an area ...
Our target article, “Insects have the capacity for subjective experience,” has provoked a diverse ra...
Item does not contain fulltextMerker suggests that the thalamocortical system is not an essential sy...
Although we are mostly supportive, we point out the strengths and weaknesses of Klein & Barron’s (20...
From the perspective of a comparative neuroanatomist studying the avian pallium, Woodruff’s (2017) c...
Klein & Barron’s (K & B’s) suggestion that insects have the capacity for phenomenal consciousness is...
Engel et al. (1999) claim that ‘‘appropriate synchronization among cortical neurons may be one of th...
According to higher-order thought accounts of phenomenal consciousness (e.g. Carruthers, 2000) it is...
Historically, the scientific and medical communities have taken a corticocentric view on consciousne...