Add to ORKGThe many substantive criticisms raised against Key by me and by many of the other commentators will not disappear by ignoring or waving them aside with meta-discourse about anthropomorphism, just-so stories, or celestial teapots. The conceptual edifice Key inhabits and defends with such gusto may look like an impregnable fortress from the inside – and Key behaves as if it were. From the outside, however, it looks more like a ramshackle structure gaping with holes and pieced together from imperfectly understood neuroscience and often faulty literature citations
The commentaries on Key’s (2016) target article make it clear that there is a great deal of doubt ab...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
In this second commentary I outline the inadequacy of Key\u27s responses to the many peer critiques ...
The structure of Key\u27s (2016) argument that fish do not feel pain is flawed, betraying a fundamen...
Key’s (2016) discussion of his claim that fish do not feel pain ignores the history of attempts to s...
Key (2016) argues that fish do not feel pain based on neuroanatomical evidence. I argue that Key mak...
The many substantive criticisms raised against Key by me and by many of the other commentators will ...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
Key\u27s (2016) arguments against the view that fish feel pain can be shown to be fallacious by cons...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Even though Key (2016) has done a very thorough job of assembling evidence showing that fish are unl...
In his excellent target article, Key (2016) develops a mechanistic argument in an attempt to show wh...
Colloquial arguments for fish feeling pain are deeply rooted in anthropometric tendencies that confu...
The commentaries on Key’s (2016) target article make it clear that there is a great deal of doubt ab...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
In this second commentary I outline the inadequacy of Key\u27s responses to the many peer critiques ...
The structure of Key\u27s (2016) argument that fish do not feel pain is flawed, betraying a fundamen...
Key’s (2016) discussion of his claim that fish do not feel pain ignores the history of attempts to s...
Key (2016) argues that fish do not feel pain based on neuroanatomical evidence. I argue that Key mak...
The many substantive criticisms raised against Key by me and by many of the other commentators will ...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
Key\u27s (2016) arguments against the view that fish feel pain can be shown to be fallacious by cons...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Even though Key (2016) has done a very thorough job of assembling evidence showing that fish are unl...
In his excellent target article, Key (2016) develops a mechanistic argument in an attempt to show wh...
Colloquial arguments for fish feeling pain are deeply rooted in anthropometric tendencies that confu...
The commentaries on Key’s (2016) target article make it clear that there is a great deal of doubt ab...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...