Add to ORKGIn this second commentary I outline the inadequacy of Key\u27s responses to the many peer critiques of his thesis that have so far appeared in Animal Sentience. I illustrate with examples drawn from his response to my first commentary
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Starting with its title, Key’s (2016) target article advocates the view that fish do not feel pain. ...
The commentaries on Key’s (2016) target article make it clear that there is a great deal of doubt ab...
The many substantive criticisms raised against Key by me and by many of the other commentators will ...
The structure of Key\u27s (2016) argument that fish do not feel pain is flawed, betraying a fundamen...
Key (2016) argues that fish do not feel pain based on neuroanatomical evidence. I argue that Key mak...
Key’s (2016) discussion of his claim that fish do not feel pain ignores the history of attempts to s...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...
Even though Key (2016) has done a very thorough job of assembling evidence showing that fish are unl...
Key\u27s (2016) arguments against the view that fish feel pain can be shown to be fallacious by cons...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
Colloquial arguments for fish feeling pain are deeply rooted in anthropometric tendencies that confu...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Key’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where con...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Starting with its title, Key’s (2016) target article advocates the view that fish do not feel pain. ...
The commentaries on Key’s (2016) target article make it clear that there is a great deal of doubt ab...
The many substantive criticisms raised against Key by me and by many of the other commentators will ...
The structure of Key\u27s (2016) argument that fish do not feel pain is flawed, betraying a fundamen...
Key (2016) argues that fish do not feel pain based on neuroanatomical evidence. I argue that Key mak...
Key’s (2016) discussion of his claim that fish do not feel pain ignores the history of attempts to s...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...
Even though Key (2016) has done a very thorough job of assembling evidence showing that fish are unl...
Key\u27s (2016) arguments against the view that fish feel pain can be shown to be fallacious by cons...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
Colloquial arguments for fish feeling pain are deeply rooted in anthropometric tendencies that confu...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Key’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where con...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Starting with its title, Key’s (2016) target article advocates the view that fish do not feel pain. ...
The commentaries on Key’s (2016) target article make it clear that there is a great deal of doubt ab...