Debate about the possibility of fish pain focuses largely on the fish’s lack of the cortex considered necessary for generating pain. That view is appealing because it avoids relatively abstract debate about the nature of pain experience and subjectivity. Unfortunately, however, that debate cannot be entirely avoided. Subcortical circuits in the fish might support an immediate, raw, “pain” experience. The necessity of the cortex only becomes obvious when considering pain as an explicitly felt subjective experience. Attributing pain to fish only seems absurd when pain is considered as a state of explicit knowing
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Key argues that fish do not experience pain because they lack the necessary (but not necessarily suf...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...
Debate about the possibility of fish pain focuses largely on the fish’s lack of the cortex considere...
Do fish consciously feel pain? Addressing this question, Key (2016) asks whether the neural mechanis...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Colloquial arguments for fish feeling pain are deeply rooted in anthropometric tendencies that confu...
In his excellent target article, Key (2016) develops a mechanistic argument in an attempt to show wh...
Key\u27s (2016) arguments against the view that fish feel pain can be shown to be fallacious by cons...
Only humans can report feeling pain. In contrast, pain in animals is typically inferred on the basis...
Arguments against the fact that fish feel pain repeatedly appear even in the face of growing evidenc...
Key’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where con...
Some contemporary scientists are using comparative neurobiological data to argue that non-mammalian ...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Key argues that fish do not experience pain because they lack the necessary (but not necessarily suf...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...
Debate about the possibility of fish pain focuses largely on the fish’s lack of the cortex considere...
Do fish consciously feel pain? Addressing this question, Key (2016) asks whether the neural mechanis...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Colloquial arguments for fish feeling pain are deeply rooted in anthropometric tendencies that confu...
In his excellent target article, Key (2016) develops a mechanistic argument in an attempt to show wh...
Key\u27s (2016) arguments against the view that fish feel pain can be shown to be fallacious by cons...
Only humans can report feeling pain. In contrast, pain in animals is typically inferred on the basis...
Arguments against the fact that fish feel pain repeatedly appear even in the face of growing evidenc...
Key’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where con...
Some contemporary scientists are using comparative neurobiological data to argue that non-mammalian ...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Key argues that fish do not experience pain because they lack the necessary (but not necessarily suf...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...