Add to ORKGKey’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where conclusions about natural conditions are drawn not from research and experiments, but from subjective moral views on how things should be. Moreover, the neurobiological findings purporting to show that fish do not feel pain are insufficient for drawing this conclusion
The structure of Key\u27s (2016) argument that fish do not feel pain is flawed, betraying a fundamen...
The systematic criticism of articles providing evidence that fish and invertebrates can feel pain is...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Key’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where con...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Key (2016) argues that fish do not feel pain based on neuroanatomical evidence. I argue that Key mak...
Do fish consciously feel pain? Addressing this question, Key (2016) asks whether the neural mechanis...
Colloquial arguments for fish feeling pain are deeply rooted in anthropometric tendencies that confu...
Only humans can report feeling pain. In contrast, pain in animals is typically inferred on the basis...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Debate about the possibility of fish pain focuses largely on the fish’s lack of the cortex considere...
Starting with its title, Key’s (2016) target article advocates the view that fish do not feel pain. ...
A hypothesis like Key’s, that fish cannot feel pain, should really be stated as a null hypothesis — ...
The structure of Key\u27s (2016) argument that fish do not feel pain is flawed, betraying a fundamen...
The systematic criticism of articles providing evidence that fish and invertebrates can feel pain is...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...
Key’s (2016) target article provides some strong arguments but also makes some logical mistakes. The...
Key’s (2016) target article, “Why fish do not feel pain,” is based on a moralistic fallacy where con...
In his target article, Key (2016) reviews the neuroanatomy of human pain and uses what is known abou...
Key (2016) argues that fish do not feel pain based on neuroanatomical evidence. I argue that Key mak...
Do fish consciously feel pain? Addressing this question, Key (2016) asks whether the neural mechanis...
Colloquial arguments for fish feeling pain are deeply rooted in anthropometric tendencies that confu...
Only humans can report feeling pain. In contrast, pain in animals is typically inferred on the basis...
Key (2016) affirms that we do not know how the fish brain processes pain but denies — because fish l...
Key (2016) claims that fish do not feel pain because they lack the neural structures that have a con...
Debate about the possibility of fish pain focuses largely on the fish’s lack of the cortex considere...
Starting with its title, Key’s (2016) target article advocates the view that fish do not feel pain. ...
A hypothesis like Key’s, that fish cannot feel pain, should really be stated as a null hypothesis — ...
The structure of Key\u27s (2016) argument that fish do not feel pain is flawed, betraying a fundamen...
The systematic criticism of articles providing evidence that fish and invertebrates can feel pain is...
Key (2016) describes the neural system involved in human pain experience in an excellent fashion but...