It seems clear that heeding the opinions and recommendations of experienced neuroscientists such as Professor Beuter, the well-argued probable opinion of the time-travelling Parkinson, and Grimm and Eggel’s demands for high animal welfare and honest and realistic harm–benefit analyses, will be of paramount importance for the advancement and evolution of experiments involving NHPs, particularly in neuroscience. This will benefit animals and humans alike
In this paper we question the guidance offered to neurologists by the Ethics, Law and Humanities Com...
BACKGROUND: Current policies regulating the use of animals for scientific purposes are based on bala...
Ng’s (2016) target article built on his earlier work advocating a science of welfare biology (Ng 199...
It seems clear that heeding the opinions and recommendations of experienced neuroscientists such as ...
In a recent publication in Lab Animal,1 a nonhuman primate (NHP) researcher at the California Nation...
Held corrects the impression from the edited version of his article discussing the monkey breeding f...
Policymakers aim to move toward animal-free alternatives for scientific research and have introduced...
Grandin adds comments on her observations of livestock abuse occurring in transport trucks and sale ...
Public opposition to non-human primate (NHP) experiments is significant, yet those who defend them c...
I have never condoned animal studies of learned helplessness that entail significant physical and ps...
Neuroscience research in non-human primates (NHPs) has delivered fundamental knowledge about human b...
The author suggests that attempts to encourage animal communication with humans overlook the sophist...
that animals are exploited unjustly by researchers. Ulrich argued that if we grant that animals are ...
The use of animals in neuroscience and biomedical research remains controversial. Policy is built ar...
In this paper, I respond to the challenge raised against contemporary experimental neurobiology acco...
In this paper we question the guidance offered to neurologists by the Ethics, Law and Humanities Com...
BACKGROUND: Current policies regulating the use of animals for scientific purposes are based on bala...
Ng’s (2016) target article built on his earlier work advocating a science of welfare biology (Ng 199...
It seems clear that heeding the opinions and recommendations of experienced neuroscientists such as ...
In a recent publication in Lab Animal,1 a nonhuman primate (NHP) researcher at the California Nation...
Held corrects the impression from the edited version of his article discussing the monkey breeding f...
Policymakers aim to move toward animal-free alternatives for scientific research and have introduced...
Grandin adds comments on her observations of livestock abuse occurring in transport trucks and sale ...
Public opposition to non-human primate (NHP) experiments is significant, yet those who defend them c...
I have never condoned animal studies of learned helplessness that entail significant physical and ps...
Neuroscience research in non-human primates (NHPs) has delivered fundamental knowledge about human b...
The author suggests that attempts to encourage animal communication with humans overlook the sophist...
that animals are exploited unjustly by researchers. Ulrich argued that if we grant that animals are ...
The use of animals in neuroscience and biomedical research remains controversial. Policy is built ar...
In this paper, I respond to the challenge raised against contemporary experimental neurobiology acco...
In this paper we question the guidance offered to neurologists by the Ethics, Law and Humanities Com...
BACKGROUND: Current policies regulating the use of animals for scientific purposes are based on bala...
Ng’s (2016) target article built on his earlier work advocating a science of welfare biology (Ng 199...