This article reviews examples of scornful contemptuous belittling or sarcastic language by judges addressing litigants who are poor marginalized or seeking to redress unfamiliar injuries Often courts employ language of this sort when dismissing cases that strike them as offthewall or when imposing Rule 11 sanctions for claims that seem to them frivolous The authors develop a theory to understand and limit sarcasm and satire to situations that genuinely call for the
Since the early 1990s, federal courts in the Second and Third Circuits have, with increasing frequen...
This article discusses the traditional law of defamation, with particular emphasis on standards of l...
Antonin Scalia is by far the Supreme Court’s greatest wit and most colorful personality. When I choo...
This article reviews examples of scornful contemptuous belittling or sarcastic language by judges ad...
Justice Scalia is the most sarcastic Justice on the Supreme Court. He has been for at least the last...
The thesis of the article is that the Court’s enterprise is centered on preserving community through...
Courts have been expressing exasperation with increasing frequency particularly in cases brought by ...
The judicial sanction of contempt threatens the trial attorney in all facets of his professional lif...
All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acc...
Moral outrage is a substantive and remedial feature of our laws, and the Article addresses three que...
This essay offers something different from the usual law review article: an examination of Justice ...
The last Scrivener (November issue at page 2257) focused on a leading complaint that four Denver Dis...
If the assertions that this essay makes about the Court\u27s unfair prosecution-orientation withst...
Humorous judicial opinions are curious legal creatures. Although they account for only a small perce...
Cases to be cited below in this article will show that libel\u27s line of danger in many instances i...
Since the early 1990s, federal courts in the Second and Third Circuits have, with increasing frequen...
This article discusses the traditional law of defamation, with particular emphasis on standards of l...
Antonin Scalia is by far the Supreme Court’s greatest wit and most colorful personality. When I choo...
This article reviews examples of scornful contemptuous belittling or sarcastic language by judges ad...
Justice Scalia is the most sarcastic Justice on the Supreme Court. He has been for at least the last...
The thesis of the article is that the Court’s enterprise is centered on preserving community through...
Courts have been expressing exasperation with increasing frequency particularly in cases brought by ...
The judicial sanction of contempt threatens the trial attorney in all facets of his professional lif...
All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acc...
Moral outrage is a substantive and remedial feature of our laws, and the Article addresses three que...
This essay offers something different from the usual law review article: an examination of Justice ...
The last Scrivener (November issue at page 2257) focused on a leading complaint that four Denver Dis...
If the assertions that this essay makes about the Court\u27s unfair prosecution-orientation withst...
Humorous judicial opinions are curious legal creatures. Although they account for only a small perce...
Cases to be cited below in this article will show that libel\u27s line of danger in many instances i...
Since the early 1990s, federal courts in the Second and Third Circuits have, with increasing frequen...
This article discusses the traditional law of defamation, with particular emphasis on standards of l...
Antonin Scalia is by far the Supreme Court’s greatest wit and most colorful personality. When I choo...