The fact-finding process in civil proceedings by expert opinion

The dissertation deals with the problem of proving by expert opinion in civil court proceedings. The scientific goal of the thesis is to present a legal analysis of expert evidence in civil court proceedings and inherently related problematic theoretical and application aspects, which relate in different ways both to the persons of the parties and to the experts, and last but not least to the court as an instance a unit which decides the dispute between the parties with the help of an expert opinion. The main working hypothesis of the dissertation thesis is the fact that the valid legal regulation of expert evidence in civil court proceedings is in many respects obsolete and inadequate conditions, which in turn brings to the practice a number of problematic moments, some of which are liable to endanger and the overall interest in a fair decision on the matter itself. The task of a historic passage was primarily to define the questions that continually reappeared over time and whose resolution authors and legal practice approached in different ways at different times. One typical example is the institute of the expert witness, in that this institute was first embedded in the rules of civil procedure of Austro-Hungary, was abandoned under socialist law and has been resuscitated in connection with..