This paper explores why the Prevent strand of the UK Government’s counter-terrorism strategy, CONTEST, is failing to achieve success in reducing radicalisation of young Muslims. By refusing to engage with extremists, and denying ‘extreme’ ideas a platform for expression, this paper will explain how the importance of cultural-linguistic epistemologies, and their role in extremism, has been overlooked. Rather than striving to understand how socio-political factors influence one’s reading of religious doctrines or interpretation of ideology, Prevent understands ideology to be the core radicalising agent, used by influential figures who can exploit the grievances of the vulnerable. The problematic repercussions of this will be addressed through...
This chapter critiques the UK’s Prevent programme since its inception in 2006, and argues that it ha...
How can potential future terrorists be identified? Forming one of the four pillars of the United Kin...
This article critically assesses calls for ‘normativity’ in counter-radicalisation and counter-extre...
This paper explores why the Prevent strand of the UK Government’s counter-terrorism strategy, CONTES...
In response to the threat of terrorism and radicalisation, the UK government introduced the countert...
This article debates the justifications behind the practice of counter-radicalization and de-radical...
The British government’s controversial counter-terrorism strategies and policies have come under fie...
Academic literature on the Prevent counter-radicalisation strategy has long been dominated by negati...
The Counter-Terrorism and Security Act (CTSA) mandates specified authorities to demonstrate due rega...
While this article’s main focus is on the UK’s Prevent strategy, it includes a comparative study wit...
This is the author accepted manuscript. the final version is available via Westlaw UKThe past decade...
As the UK has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposing to introdu...
As the United Kingdom has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposin...
This article describes how disrupting the activities of suspected violent extremists has become an i...
De-radicalisation policy carries with it an inherent tension: those who provide the most invaluable ...
This chapter critiques the UK’s Prevent programme since its inception in 2006, and argues that it ha...
How can potential future terrorists be identified? Forming one of the four pillars of the United Kin...
This article critically assesses calls for ‘normativity’ in counter-radicalisation and counter-extre...
This paper explores why the Prevent strand of the UK Government’s counter-terrorism strategy, CONTES...
In response to the threat of terrorism and radicalisation, the UK government introduced the countert...
This article debates the justifications behind the practice of counter-radicalization and de-radical...
The British government’s controversial counter-terrorism strategies and policies have come under fie...
Academic literature on the Prevent counter-radicalisation strategy has long been dominated by negati...
The Counter-Terrorism and Security Act (CTSA) mandates specified authorities to demonstrate due rega...
While this article’s main focus is on the UK’s Prevent strategy, it includes a comparative study wit...
This is the author accepted manuscript. the final version is available via Westlaw UKThe past decade...
As the UK has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposing to introdu...
As the United Kingdom has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposin...
This article describes how disrupting the activities of suspected violent extremists has become an i...
De-radicalisation policy carries with it an inherent tension: those who provide the most invaluable ...
This chapter critiques the UK’s Prevent programme since its inception in 2006, and argues that it ha...
How can potential future terrorists be identified? Forming one of the four pillars of the United Kin...
This article critically assesses calls for ‘normativity’ in counter-radicalisation and counter-extre...