Cartels, trusts and agreements to reduce competition between firms have existed for centuries, but became particularly prevalent toward the end of the 19th century. In the mid-20th century governments began to use so called ‘cartel registers’ to monitor and regulate their behaviour. This book provides cases studies from more than a dozen countries to examine the emergence, application and eventual decline of this form of regulation
The Japanese antitrust agency (the J-FTC) holds a jurisdictional monopoly over most issues. Because ...
In a "sanctuary strategy", a firm uses restraints to competition in its home market to create a prof...
Prior to the return of democracy in 1999, the Nigerian economy was characterised by government-spons...
Cartels, trusts and agreements to reduce competition between firms have existed for centuries, but b...
Cartels, trusts and agreements to reduce competition between firms have existed for centuries, but b...
This article has two main objectives. First, it attempts to explain how, as if rising from the ashes...
Article published in Amicus Curiae - Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies. The Journal ...
This paper presents a dynamic model of regulatory protection. The regulator grants the industry rent...
In this Article, I examine Japanese competition law and policy with a view toward increasing its eff...
This Article compares four jurisdictional approaches to anticompetitive behavior: (1) the U.S. “rule...
The fact of a small number of hostile takeover bids in Japan the recent past, together with technica...
In 1977 the United States\u27 bilateral trade deficit with Japan was over 8 billion dollars, roughly...
In this Essay I examine Haley’s claim that we see more regulatory continuity than change in Japan, t...
How much has competition among Japanese firms changed? Have the tougher penalties provided under the...
The Japanese substantive competition law is, in theory, very well equipped to prevent anticompetitiv...
The Japanese antitrust agency (the J-FTC) holds a jurisdictional monopoly over most issues. Because ...
In a "sanctuary strategy", a firm uses restraints to competition in its home market to create a prof...
Prior to the return of democracy in 1999, the Nigerian economy was characterised by government-spons...
Cartels, trusts and agreements to reduce competition between firms have existed for centuries, but b...
Cartels, trusts and agreements to reduce competition between firms have existed for centuries, but b...
This article has two main objectives. First, it attempts to explain how, as if rising from the ashes...
Article published in Amicus Curiae - Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies. The Journal ...
This paper presents a dynamic model of regulatory protection. The regulator grants the industry rent...
In this Article, I examine Japanese competition law and policy with a view toward increasing its eff...
This Article compares four jurisdictional approaches to anticompetitive behavior: (1) the U.S. “rule...
The fact of a small number of hostile takeover bids in Japan the recent past, together with technica...
In 1977 the United States\u27 bilateral trade deficit with Japan was over 8 billion dollars, roughly...
In this Essay I examine Haley’s claim that we see more regulatory continuity than change in Japan, t...
How much has competition among Japanese firms changed? Have the tougher penalties provided under the...
The Japanese substantive competition law is, in theory, very well equipped to prevent anticompetitiv...
The Japanese antitrust agency (the J-FTC) holds a jurisdictional monopoly over most issues. Because ...
In a "sanctuary strategy", a firm uses restraints to competition in its home market to create a prof...
Prior to the return of democracy in 1999, the Nigerian economy was characterised by government-spons...