Add to ORKGArticle published in Amicus Curiae - Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies. The Journal is produced by the Society for Advanced Legal Studies at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London
In a recent series of cases the Japanese Fair Trade Commission has adopted a strict illegality appro...
In this Essay, I will explain the causes of the perception gap between home and abroad regarding the...
This Article compares four jurisdictional approaches to anticompetitive behavior: (1) the U.S. “rule...
In this Article, I examine Japanese competition law and policy with a view toward increasing its eff...
In 1947, Japan enacted the Act Concerning Prohibition of Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trad...
This article focuses on the legislative history of the Japanese Antimonopoly Law and a comparison be...
The Antimonopoly Law of Japan became effective in July 1947, less than two decades ago. The act was ...
This Article examines the original intent of those involved in drafting Japan\u27s Antimonopoly Ac...
Competition laws promote economic efficiency and social welfare by prohibiting restrictive business ...
How much has competition among Japanese firms changed? Have the tougher penalties provided under the...
Cartels, trusts and agreements to reduce competition between firms have existed for centuries, but b...
This article has two main objectives. First, it attempts to explain how, as if rising from the ashes...
This Article will discuss these two perspectives by first introducing the Japanese experiences in go...
The Japanese substantive competition law is, in theory, very well equipped to prevent anticompetitiv...
This article deals with the question of differences in competition policy enforcement regimes in Jap...
In a recent series of cases the Japanese Fair Trade Commission has adopted a strict illegality appro...
In this Essay, I will explain the causes of the perception gap between home and abroad regarding the...
This Article compares four jurisdictional approaches to anticompetitive behavior: (1) the U.S. “rule...
In this Article, I examine Japanese competition law and policy with a view toward increasing its eff...
In 1947, Japan enacted the Act Concerning Prohibition of Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trad...
This article focuses on the legislative history of the Japanese Antimonopoly Law and a comparison be...
The Antimonopoly Law of Japan became effective in July 1947, less than two decades ago. The act was ...
This Article examines the original intent of those involved in drafting Japan\u27s Antimonopoly Ac...
Competition laws promote economic efficiency and social welfare by prohibiting restrictive business ...
How much has competition among Japanese firms changed? Have the tougher penalties provided under the...
Cartels, trusts and agreements to reduce competition between firms have existed for centuries, but b...
This article has two main objectives. First, it attempts to explain how, as if rising from the ashes...
This Article will discuss these two perspectives by first introducing the Japanese experiences in go...
The Japanese substantive competition law is, in theory, very well equipped to prevent anticompetitiv...
This article deals with the question of differences in competition policy enforcement regimes in Jap...
In a recent series of cases the Japanese Fair Trade Commission has adopted a strict illegality appro...
In this Essay, I will explain the causes of the perception gap between home and abroad regarding the...
This Article compares four jurisdictional approaches to anticompetitive behavior: (1) the U.S. “rule...