Drawing on a survey of academic economists in the Netherlands, Harry van Dalen¸ explores how publish or perish culture is perceived and enacted within academia. Arguing that the current arrangement of the academy along lines that promote outputs (publications) displaces both the goal of more intrinsically motivated forms of scientific innovation and those who pursue them, he argues for a form of academic management more focused on inputs and the promotion of academics with a ‘taste for ideas’, rather than publications
A pandemic has transformed the academic publishing industry. The way that books are commissioned and...
Last year a number of early career academics discovered that their PhD theses, which had been deposi...
The limitations of journal based citation metrics for assessing individual researchers are well know...
Justin Gest author of Mass Appeal: Communicating Policy Ideas in Multiple Media asks why not publish...
The world of scholarly publishing is in upheaval. As the open science and open research movements ra...
A recent report from Jisc showcases the upward trend in universities and academics setting up their ...
In a recent Impact Blog post, Jørgen Carling outlined the reasons why he feels the PhD by publicatio...
Through different mechanisms pay to publish models have been established globally as one of the key ...
In Metrics at Work: Journalism and the Contested Meaning of Algorithms, Angèle Christin explores how...
Funding for research communication is a growing feature of grant applications and whilst digital sch...
One of the proposed advantages of open access publication is that it increases the impact of academi...
Academics today have to publish to succeed. In Publish or Perish: Perceived Benefits versus Unintend...
In disciplines where the academic book is the primary means for communicating research and establish...
Drawing on their recent analysis of journals in the field of Higher Education Studies, which shows t...
Is the peer review process simply a means by which errors are identified and corrected? Or is it a p...
A pandemic has transformed the academic publishing industry. The way that books are commissioned and...
Last year a number of early career academics discovered that their PhD theses, which had been deposi...
The limitations of journal based citation metrics for assessing individual researchers are well know...
Justin Gest author of Mass Appeal: Communicating Policy Ideas in Multiple Media asks why not publish...
The world of scholarly publishing is in upheaval. As the open science and open research movements ra...
A recent report from Jisc showcases the upward trend in universities and academics setting up their ...
In a recent Impact Blog post, Jørgen Carling outlined the reasons why he feels the PhD by publicatio...
Through different mechanisms pay to publish models have been established globally as one of the key ...
In Metrics at Work: Journalism and the Contested Meaning of Algorithms, Angèle Christin explores how...
Funding for research communication is a growing feature of grant applications and whilst digital sch...
One of the proposed advantages of open access publication is that it increases the impact of academi...
Academics today have to publish to succeed. In Publish or Perish: Perceived Benefits versus Unintend...
In disciplines where the academic book is the primary means for communicating research and establish...
Drawing on their recent analysis of journals in the field of Higher Education Studies, which shows t...
Is the peer review process simply a means by which errors are identified and corrected? Or is it a p...
A pandemic has transformed the academic publishing industry. The way that books are commissioned and...
Last year a number of early career academics discovered that their PhD theses, which had been deposi...
The limitations of journal based citation metrics for assessing individual researchers are well know...